Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
http://warehousespeakers.com/proddetail.php?prod=ET65#
If it will sounds as nice as the other replicas, it will be a real deal...
anyone tested it?
If it will sounds as nice as the other replicas, it will be a real deal...
anyone tested it?
-
bluesfendermanblues
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:57 pm
- Location: Dumble City, Europe
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
You got yourself a project for the summer, readin' through ALL the posts on ampgarage
OR
You could try search and find this post: https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... =warehouse

OR
You could try search and find this post: https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.ph ... =warehouse
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
yeah, just looked at that post, but it's two months old and maybe someone else has tested them...however, sorry for the "double post"...
-
bluesfendermanblues
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:57 pm
- Location: Dumble City, Europe
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
Didn't mean to step on yo
Haven't tried the warespeaker myself, but I just bought 4 x 80's Celection 12G65 - the real deal - on Ebay for a total of 355 USD. How about that ??
Haven't tried the warespeaker myself, but I just bought 4 x 80's Celection 12G65 - the real deal - on Ebay for a total of 355 USD. How about that ??
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
I would like to know if Bob and Gary have tested these after that last post. I was curious about how they sound compared to the Celestions as the WGS are much more reasonable.
Norm seemed to compare them to the originals. I don't think I'll have a chance to ever try the originals.
I would like to know if the WGS compare favorably to the reissues, which I seemed to miss in the last post that was referencd in this post.
Peace (Ringo here in town this week),
Norm seemed to compare them to the originals. I don't think I'll have a chance to ever try the originals.
I would like to know if the WGS compare favorably to the reissues, which I seemed to miss in the last post that was referencd in this post.
Peace (Ringo here in town this week),
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
no problem bro...bluesfendermanblues wrote:Didn't mean to step on yo![]()
Haven't tried the warespeaker myself, but I just bought 4 x 80's Celection 12G65 - the real deal - on Ebay for a total of 355 USD. How about that ??
you made a deal on that cab...
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
I put one in my D'Lite 22 wide body combo, replacing a WGS lead 80.
It's warmer and less hard rock sounding and compares well with the Blue in my tweed Deluxe.
2 short clips comparing the 65 and 80 are here.
http://web.mac.com/paddedcell/iWeb/Abal ... hotos.html
It's warmer and less hard rock sounding and compares well with the Blue in my tweed Deluxe.
2 short clips comparing the 65 and 80 are here.
http://web.mac.com/paddedcell/iWeb/Abal ... hotos.html
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
that's an interesting comparison but to my ears the 80 seems warmer and sweeter, while the 65 is harder and edgy...phalanges wrote:I put one in my D'Lite 22 wide body combo, replacing a WGS lead 80.
It's warmer and less hard rock sounding and compares well with the Blue in my tweed Deluxe.
2 short clips comparing the 65 and 80 are here.
http://web.mac.com/paddedcell/iWeb/Abal ... hotos.html
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
I don't hear the 80 as cold or hard but more rock and "modern".
I think the 65's more milk chocolate to the 80's dark chocolate.
And the 80 is 4 or 5 dB more efficient.
Of course, ears and taste buds vary twixt humans.
I think the 65's more milk chocolate to the 80's dark chocolate.
And the 80 is 4 or 5 dB more efficient.
Of course, ears and taste buds vary twixt humans.
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
In fact I felt the 80 darker and sweeter...phalanges wrote:I don't hear the 80 as cold or hard but more rock and "modern".
I think the 65's more milk chocolate to the 80's dark chocolate.
And the 80 is 4 or 5 dB more efficient.
Of course, ears and taste buds vary twixt humans.
The 65 seems more articulate and on the bright side.
Am i wrong?
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
You can only be wrong if there's a right (which there ain't) and even then it wouldn't matter 'cause judging from your clips, you're a killer player.
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
Lead 80 and 65 reissue are two completely different beasts. 80 has an even response that reminds me an electro-voice, whereas the 65 has a very pronounced mid honk.
The 65 is also a very "inefficient" speaker, almost half the volume of the 80.
my .02
Teo
The 65 is also a very "inefficient" speaker, almost half the volume of the 80.
my .02
Teo
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
I have the WGS G12-65 clone. I compared it directly to a Celestion 65 in the same cab. I preferred the WGS. This was with a Two Rock amp.
Joe
Re: Has anyone tried the WGS G12-65 replica?
What was the difference between the two? I was hoping they'd be pretty similar.JoeB63 wrote:I have the WGS G12-65 clone. I compared it directly to a Celestion 65 in the same cab. I preferred the WGS. This was with a Two Rock amp.
67:1