First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by martin manning »

GAStan wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:23 pm
Raoul Duke wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:15 pm Lug 3 is -66, lug 1 is 0 with the pot set halfway. The resistor I used is 26k.
Shouldn't Lug 1 be around -40 to -45 volts?
Yes, about there. Something is not connected. Could be that the pot is faulty.

Duke, try measuring resistance from lugs 1 and 3 to the wiper. Do those add up to 10k?
User avatar
Raoul Duke
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
Location: S.E. Mass.

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by Raoul Duke »

Put the ground in. Didn’t make any difference.

Also - measured the pot. Lugs 3 and 2 = 5.38k and lugs 1 and 2 are 76k or the meter just runs away(?!). That seems odd.
Marc
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by martin manning »

Seems like the element isn't well connected to lug 1, or maybe it's cracked? I'd disconnect everything from the lugs and see if it looks any better.
timrobertson100
Posts: 265
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 2:25 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by timrobertson100 »

Raoul Duke wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:06 pm …or the meter just runs away(?!). That seems odd.
I’d wager that’s just the effect of using the multimeter for measuring resistance, when there is a capacitor involved.
User avatar
Raoul Duke
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
Location: S.E. Mass.

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by Raoul Duke »

Took out the bias pot and measured with nothing attached and it was the same - so I grabbed a new pot from my 2nd Gen build pile, reconnected everything, and it all works as it should. Yes!

With the 26k resistor and new pot I get a sweep from -30 to -42, so I set it to -42 for the next phase of testing.

Sound right?
Marc
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by martin manning »

-42 seems a little high. Can you reduce the value of the resistor between the PT and the bias rectifier? I think you might need another 10V or so.
User avatar
Raoul Duke
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
Location: S.E. Mass.

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by Raoul Duke »

That would be the 3k9 on the rectifier/bias board if I understand correctly?
I sure can, how much smaller? I’ve got 3k3, 3k, 2k7, and 2k2 on hand in 2 or 3 watt ratings.

Not sure if it works this way, but if it’s proportionally “1 to 1” I’d guess either the 3k or 2k7 would be the choice?
But keep in mind I know nothing of the mathematical parts of this, lol. Just trying to ask how the math works.

Thanks!👍
Marc
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by martin manning »

Correct. It's pretty nonlinear since you are dealing with a spiky charging pulse. Maybe just temporarily tack the 3k3 across the 3k9 (that will be 1.8) and see where that gets you. Once you get tubes in and try to bias them you'll find out what value will work.
User avatar
Raoul Duke
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
Location: S.E. Mass.

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by Raoul Duke »

Understood, thanks Martin - that’s exactly what I’ll do.
I’ll do that and finish the rest of the power amp testing tomorrow, but have a few questions starting with this part of your power amp test process:

“Install power and PI tubes
Connect a load to the speaker jack
Short PI input (Power Amp In) to ground with a clip lead”

Am I literally clipping a test lead from the switch tip to chassis ground?

Also, I went back and read your post breaking down Gil’s implementation of the “Ampeg PI process” and wanted to know if following his steps would be applicable to my project?

Thanks!
Marc
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by martin manning »

Raoul Duke wrote: Thu Jan 11, 2024 1:52 am “Short PI input (Power Amp In) to ground with a clip lead”
Am I literally clipping a test lead from the switch tip to chassis ground?
Yes. Doing that insures that the PI input doesn't pick up random noise from the room. See in the yellow shaded part of the schematic here: https://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... 94#p459994 If you have the master volume pot wired in, turning it full CCW does the same thing, and doing that would be sufficient.
Raoul Duke wrote: Thu Jan 11, 2024 1:52 am Also, I went back and read your post breaking down Gil’s implementation of the “Ampeg PI process” and wanted to know if following his steps would be applicable to my project?
Yes, that's exactly what you will be doing here, this post: https://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... 89#p416389
User avatar
Raoul Duke
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
Location: S.E. Mass.

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by Raoul Duke »

Got it, thanks!

Just some clarifications by step # for someone unsure of the terminology:

1. Doesn’t apply because I only have 2 power tubes?

2. Pin 8 on each tube - separate measurements, so 2 DMMs make it easier.

3. This is the audio adapter/signal generator app part (400 to 1000Hz sine wave).

4. This is the measurement from step 2 set-up.

5. Straightforward - no questions.

Last question: do you still tweak by ear after final assembly, or should this be “it” (in your experience)?

I appreciate the info and hopefully I’m interpreting this correctly. If so, I might actually be learning, lol.
Marc
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by martin manning »

Raoul Duke wrote: Thu Jan 11, 2024 5:12 pm 1. Doesn’t apply because I only have 2 power tubes? Correct

2. Pin 8 on each tube - separate measurements, so 2 DMMs make it easier. No, this measurement is from one cathode to the other, pin 8 - pin 8

3. This is the audio adapter/signal generator app part (400 to 1000Hz sine wave). Yes, but injected at the PI input

4. This is the measurement from step 2 set-up. Yes, monitor the AC voltage across the load as you increase the signal level, looking for ~12V RMS

5. Straightforward - no questions. Remember, DC mV

Last question: do you still tweak by ear after final assembly, or should this be “it” (in your experience)? Personally, I call it good when the measurement indicates balance
All of the above is done after you set the static operating point (bias).
User avatar
Raoul Duke
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
Location: S.E. Mass.

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by Raoul Duke »

martin manning wrote: Thu Jan 11, 2024 12:02 am -42 seems a little high. Can you reduce the value of the resistor between the PT and the bias rectifier? I think you might need another 10V or so.
Martin,
The additional 10V would increase the sweep on the -42 end then, correct?
Marc
User avatar
GAStan
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2023 9:35 pm
Location: El Paso, Texas

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by GAStan »

I'll add another point of view on the Last Question. Once my amp was completed I did the full procedure as outlined, then hooked up a speaker. I had my son playing random licks ( we both like Rock) while I made adjustments on the FET, OD entrance and PI pots. On the PI I did hear a difference as I adjusted it but really didn't have much of a preference of one way or another. I think this is mostly due to the fact I was (am?) still in the "honeymoon stage" with this newly completed amp. I simply went through the procedure again and left it.

I'm still amazed that it sounds as good as it does right from the beginning once I got a good set of power tubes in it (had a faulty set at first...). I know this is primarily due to the wonderful resources provided by the members of this forum! I've been following this thread and must compliment Martin on the consistent knowledgeable assistance he freely provides.

Most likely I'll revisit the PI adjustment in the future once the newness has become a thing of the distant past.

YMMV.
Glenn

I solder better than I play.
User avatar
Raoul Duke
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
Location: S.E. Mass.

Re: First D-style (102) build opinions solicited & build thread:

Post by Raoul Duke »

Right on Glenn, I feel the same way you do about all the help I’m getting from everyone and especially Martin’s patience given my probably very basic questions.

I’m sure I’ll be in the honeymoon phase for a while as well - really looking forward to seeing how I did all things considered. My original plan was to assemble as much as I could, then give it to my local amp guy to fire up and QC; but now - with everything I learn each day - I feel pretty confident I can bring this to the finish line myself (well, with you guys pushing me along, lol).

Thanks for the insight 👍
Marc
Post Reply