In an amp with 4 tubes is better use 2 bias pot for a fine adjustment and balance two pair tube?
Thanks
			
			
									
									
						1 or 2 bias pot?
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- 
				LooseChange
 - Posts: 79
 - Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:31 pm
 - Contact:
 
Re: 1 or 2 bias pot?
Any way to individually control the bias on your power tubes is better than one universal control.
The best would be a pot for each tube. Have you ever played an amp with a pair each of 6L6's and 6V6's? How about four unmatched NOS RCA? EL34's and 6550's? One each of each type listed above?
			
			
									
									
						The best would be a pot for each tube. Have you ever played an amp with a pair each of 6L6's and 6V6's? How about four unmatched NOS RCA? EL34's and 6550's? One each of each type listed above?
- Luthierwnc
 - Posts: 998
 - Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:59 am
 - Location: Asheville, NC
 
Re: 1 or 2 bias pot?
With 4 tubes you can usually mix and match to get the sides tolerably balanced.  sh
			
			
									
									
						Re: 1 or 2 bias pot?
The data sheets for KT66, KT88, etc. say that it is "essential" to have a separately adjustable bias supply for each tube. Of course, they say a lot of other stuff that we ignore ... 
			
			
									
									
						Re: 1 or 2 bias pot?
Balancing currents in the two halves of the OT is very important when max headroom and bandwidth is mandatory: for instance bass amps!
In a guitar amp isn't always a good idea unless you do balance also the PI levels to preserve symmetrical clipping of the output tubes.
teo
			
			
									
									
						In a guitar amp isn't always a good idea unless you do balance also the PI levels to preserve symmetrical clipping of the output tubes.
teo
Re: 1 or 2 bias pot?
Well , there are different ideas about this.