Nope, it is a different "JM" -- Joe Mloganoski, co-founder of Two-Rock. The top signature is Bill Krinard's (the other co-founder of Two-Rock).
NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
Thanks for the info
Sound was great, but both #124 and mine #102 was IMHO better sounding.
Sound was great, but both #124 and mine #102 was IMHO better sounding.
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
My bad, you are totally right. MK3 has the tweed style mixer, 2 the Fender style. My apologies for the confusion.
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
Just curious: what ODS type is the preamp? 102?
It will never sound like a ODS though. Contour, reverb, half a dumbleator, etc. Lots of differences.
It will never sound like a ODS though. Contour, reverb, half a dumbleator, etc. Lots of differences.
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
From what I recall of the Custom Reverb Signature line, they are all high plate skylines. The Classic Reverb / Mayer line of amps are low plate classics.
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
Still cool to see more gut shots. Thanks for sharing! If nothing else this was around the same time period as the JM sig amps and we see similar parts selection...draloric LCA for most of the circuit, NTE GNFB resistor, philips bypass caps, new production dale plates, etc. Very cool!
-Dan
-Dan
- norburybrook
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
are they diodes? they look like voltage regulators at first glance. I've never seen a diode like this
you learn something everyday.
M
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4244
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
1 others liked this
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
Yes I've seen both single and dual diodes like this a ton in SMPS's and the like, the larger body allows for better current handling I think, and heatsinking if needed.
~Phil
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
I just removed cap from RETURN pot and sound is now so much clearer
What is the purpose of that cap anyway?
What is the purpose of that cap anyway?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
It adds a little brightness to the reverb signal, and at higher reverb levels, adds some "splash." If you prefer it without it, then keep it without a cap. In fact, it's something that Two-Rock apparently preferred as well, because on the Crystal amps (a re-release of the JM circuit about 8 years after the limited edition run), they removed that cap.
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
1 others liked this
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
I think just the opposite. Any time you have a cap to ground it is going to bleed off high frequencies. This 10n cap across the return pot will reduce high frequencies and reduce the level of the reverb return signal.jfs322 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 7:21 pmIt adds a little brightness to the reverb signal, and at higher reverb levels, adds some "splash." If you prefer it without it, then keep it without a cap. In fact, it's something that Two-Rock apparently preferred as well, because on the Crystal amps (a re-release of the JM circuit about 8 years after the limited edition run), they removed that cap.
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
I had a same feeling, more pF darken the sound, also lower the reverb level
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
Yes, my mistake -- I was speaking in terms of what removing the reverb cap would do (i.e. brighten up the reverb a bit relative to the sound with the cap in place), not speaking in terms of what adding the cap does. So I was just talking about it from the "flipside of the coin," so to speak. My apologies for the confusion.martin manning wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 8:38 pmI think just the opposite. Any time you have a cap to ground it is going to bleed off high frequencies. This 10n cap across the return pot will reduce high frequencies and reduce the level of the reverb return signal.jfs322 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 7:21 pmIt adds a little brightness to the reverb signal, and at higher reverb levels, adds some "splash." If you prefer it without it, then keep it without a cap. In fact, it's something that Two-Rock apparently preferred as well, because on the Crystal amps (a re-release of the JM circuit about 8 years after the limited edition run), they removed that cap.
Last edited by jfs322 on Sat Apr 17, 2021 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Bombacaototal
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
I think Two Rock added the cap to (i) address the reverb hum, which happens due to the classic tone PT and small headshell, and placement of the tank. (II) reduce the amount of reverb for a better dry/wet ratio given they use the 1M resistor on the dry path which really reduces gain (III) as mentioned above to make the reverb darker
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: NOS John Mayer Sig / Wonderland 100W
The value of the cap used will have very little effect at 50-60 Hz, so reducing hum is not likely to be a factor. I can agree that a poorly positioned reverb tank can create a hum problem, but why do you think the Classic Tone PT is worse than others?Bombacaototal wrote: ↑Sat Apr 17, 2021 5:36 am I think Two Rock added the cap to (i) address the reverb hum, which happens due to the classic tone PT and small headshell, and placement of the tank.