Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Fender Amp Discussion

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Bombacaototal
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by Bombacaototal »

sluckey wrote: Fri May 17, 2019 4:36 pm I would mount the 220K directly on the return jack. Just let the jacks use their own self grounding (no insulating washers) and don't run any extra ground wires to the jacks. Maybe that will work. It did for Leo. :wink:
Done as suggested. Unfortunately no difference :shock: :cry:

Is it worth attempting the isolation washers or is the ground loop is probably coming from elsewhere
sluckey
Posts: 3528
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:48 pm
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by sluckey »

Is it worth attempting the isolation washers or is the ground loop is probably coming from elsewhere
Remember the gator clip test? The results indicate the hum originates in the recovery tube. Insulating washers should not make any difference.

I went through this with my TDR (Deluxe Reverb) build several years ago. My cure was rolling tubes in the recovery tube socket. I ended up using a 5751. I do recall a guy that had hum problems that appeared to come from the recovery tube but were actually caused by the 12AT7 driver. He swears that another 12AT7 was his fix. Didn't seem logical to me but sometime hum issues can be very illogical. Try this. Disconnect the tank cables from the amp and use a gator clip to ground the return jack. You should still have hum with the reverb pot turned up. While listening to the hum, pull the 12AT7 driver tube. Any difference?
Bombacaototal
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by Bombacaototal »

sluckey wrote: Sat May 18, 2019 11:25 am
Is it worth attempting the isolation washers or is the ground loop is probably coming from elsewhere
Remember the gator clip test? The results indicate the hum originates in the recovery tube. Insulating washers should not make any difference.

I went through this with my TDR (Deluxe Reverb) build several years ago. My cure was rolling tubes in the recovery tube socket. I ended up using a 5751. I do recall a guy that had hum problems that appeared to come from the recovery tube but were actually caused by the 12AT7 driver. He swears that another 12AT7 was his fix. Didn't seem logical to me but sometime hum issues can be very illogical. Try this. Disconnect the tank cables from the amp and use a gator clip to ground the return jack. You should still have hum with the reverb pot turned up. While listening to the hum, pull the 12AT7 driver tube. Any difference?
Thanks sluckey. I did exactly as instructed but unfortunately no difference. Maybe I also checked the grounding on both pots
pdf64
Posts: 2932
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by pdf64 »

Fully bypassing (ie well below mains freq) input stage cathodes cab be beneficial for signal to noise ratio, ie minimising hum and hiss. The reverb recovery stage may be regarded as an input stage.
https://www.justgiving.com/page/5-in-5-for-charlie This is my step son and his family. He is running 5 marathons in 5 days to support the research into STXBP1, the genetic condition my grandson Charlie has. Please consider supporting him!
Bombacaototal
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by Bombacaototal »

Bombacaototal wrote: Fri May 17, 2019 9:09 am I removed the cathode cap of the reverb recovery. Indeed an improvement as far as noise but as you said weaker reverb, and also the frequency reponse seems to have changed slightly. I still prefer the sound of the reverb with the cap but I cannot stand the noise floor, so will leave the cathode without the cap for now.

I also just bought a low noise 7025. Cannot wait to try it out. Hopefully that will do it! I will report back as soon as I have it.
https://www.watfordvalves.com/product_detail.asp?id=684

Many thanks again for the help.
Forgot to report back. I tried the low noise 7025, and noticed an improvement, maybe 10% or 15% less noise but overall the noise floor is fairly high. I think the only option left is having the amp without the reverb recovery cathode cap, even if it sounds less nice overall.
TUBEDUDE
Posts: 1864
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Mastersville

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by TUBEDUDE »

Still sounds like a grounding/sheilding issue if the noise/hum level is so noticable as to require circuit modification to be useable.
Tube junkie that aspires to become a tri-state bidirectional buss driver.
Bombacaototal
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by Bombacaototal »

TUBEDUDE wrote: Mon Aug 19, 2019 10:38 am Still sounds like a grounding/sheilding issue if the noise/hum level is so noticable as to require circuit modification to be useable.
So I played around with different reverb pans, and also different grounding options on the pan itself. They are usually only grounded on the return (red) but for some reason I get the least amount of issues with both send (Black) and return (red) grounded inside the pan on ones of the 3 pans I tried.

Still there is issue, and below is an audio of master at 3 o’clock (I added a dumble style master on mine) and you can hear me turning the reverb pot up and down. I am using the least noisy of the 3 pans with send (Black) and return (red) grounded inside the pan.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by norburybrook »

Bombacaototal wrote: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:08 am
TUBEDUDE wrote: Mon Aug 19, 2019 10:38 am Still sounds like a grounding/sheilding issue if the noise/hum level is so noticable as to require circuit modification to be useable.
So I played around with different reverb pans, and also different grounding options on the pan itself. They are usually only grounded on the return (red) but for some reason I get the least amount of issues with both send (Black) and return (red) grounded inside the pan on ones of the 3 pans I tried.

Still there is issue, and below is an audio of master at 3 o’clock (I added a dumble style master on mine) and you can hear me turning the reverb pot up and down. I am using the least noisy of the 3 pans with send (Black) and return (red) grounded inside the pan.
that's not right definitely. I Built a princeton reverb recently in a wreck chassis, I had to mount stuff where I could and it's all in reverse etc but it's quiet, that noise sounds like a trainwreck express!!!!!! which you would expect :D something definitely squirely with your amp but I'm afraid I can't help with what that is...sorry


M
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by tubeswell »

Is this a head? or a combo? (How close is the pan's output transducer to the PT?)
He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Bombacaototal
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by Bombacaototal »

tubeswell wrote: Tue Aug 20, 2019 7:08 pm Is this a head? or a combo? (How close is the pan's output transducer to the PT?)
It’s a head and I’ve tried with the pan as far from the amp as I could.
I think there is still a ground loop or cold solder joint somewhere
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by tubeswell »

So did you turn the pan around so that the output transducer was away from the PT end of the chassis?
He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Bombacaototal
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by Bombacaototal »

tubeswell wrote: Wed Aug 21, 2019 1:33 pm So did you turn the pan around so that the output transducer was away from the PT end of the chassis?
Yes, I tried with the reverb pan at about 2 meters away from the amp
User avatar
pompeiisneaks
Site Admin
Posts: 4244
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
Location: Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by pompeiisneaks »

I literally had to play with the reverb pan on a Reeves Space Cowboy because it was causing hum, I ended up twisting it slightly off axis and adding in extra cardboard on the bottom of the reverb bag to create a bit more 'noise cancelling' before I got it to a 'semi decent' level. It can be quite a PITA to get reverb pans inside the cabinet, to not hum. As soon as I moved it outside the cabinet, it went dead silent. :D

~Phil
tUber Nerd!
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by tubeswell »

Bombacaototal wrote: Tue Aug 20, 2019 9:29 pm I think there is still a ground loop or cold solder joint somewhere
Ground loops are a nuisance in reverb circuits (because the S:N ratio is particularly important in the recovery stage). Where have to got the reverb recovery stage grounded?

(I presume you've re-flowed all the joints?)
He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Bombacaototal
Posts: 1711
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am

Re: Princeton Reverb - Reverb Noise

Post by Bombacaototal »

tubeswell wrote: Wed Aug 21, 2019 6:56 pm
Bombacaototal wrote: Tue Aug 20, 2019 9:29 pm I think there is still a ground loop or cold solder joint somewhere
Ground loops are a nuisance in reverb circuits (because the S:N ratio is particularly important in the recovery stage). Where have to got the reverb recovery stage grounded?

(I presume you've re-flowed all the joints?)
My reverb recovery cathode is grounded at the buss bar which goes to a star ground washer near the input. It's supply is also grounded at the same place (ie star ground washer)
Post Reply