Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Fender Amp Discussion

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by martin manning »

So it’s still a cathodyne, but now it’s a fixed bias cathodyne. That’s also called the “Ampeg” mod.
telentubes
Posts: 897
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 11:29 pm
Location: Bellingham, WA.
Contact:

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by telentubes »

Thanks for that clarification. I'm going to go back and change the other post.
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by norburybrook »

Right then..A good day of soldering and I'm done. I just need my ceramic caps and a fuse holder which should be here tomorrow and I can fire up.

It's a pretty untidy build I'm afraid but squeezing everything in to a trainwreck chassis has proved tricky and not ideal, working in reverse gave me some head scratching moments :D Anyway I've got it all in and wired, my only concern is the distance of the bias tremolo controls from the actual bias board/bias pot. I'm hoping the long cable run wont cause issues. Also I've added a bias pot how should I set this and where do I measure things?

I've used the basic mods on Rob Robbinettes page, grid stoppers, the bias pot, upgraded B+ resistors and Bias cap. I used my Dumble bus bar grounding method with this as it's served me well. everything on the board/pots tied in to a single ground at the input. The main filter cap and everything else grounded together at an 'output' ground.
IMG_20190620_174344-01.jpeg
IMG_20190620_174327-01.jpeg
onward and upwards.....


M
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by martin manning »

You could use the OT primary resistance method (slow), or the OT primary shunt method (scary), or maybe you can find a way to add some 1Ω current sense resistors somewhere?
telentubes
Posts: 897
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 11:29 pm
Location: Bellingham, WA.
Contact:

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by telentubes »

The PR can be a rats nest by nature. Yours looks pretty well organized.
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by norburybrook »

martin manning wrote: Thu Jun 20, 2019 6:37 pm You could use the OT primary resistance method (slow), or the OT primary shunt method (scary), or maybe you can find a way to add some 1Ω current sense resistors somewhere?
thanks Martin, I've removed the Cathode grounds and inserted 1R resistors. I'm just waiting for the postman with my SM/Ceramic caps.



M
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by norburybrook »

Ok finished wiring. Put valves in and started up on the light bulb limiter, no issues.

Fired up normally and the 6V6's are red plating regardless where I set the bias pot. I have a 25k lin pot with a 10k resistor.

I have no sound, there is a hum.

Can i leave the rectifier valve in and remove the others to take voltage readings?

M
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by martin manning »

Yes. To be very thorough, you could measure AC voltages with the rectifier removed, and note that you can measure the bias voltage in that configuration.
sluckey
Posts: 3528
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:48 pm
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by sluckey »

I think I see pin 5 of the 6V6s have a grid stopper connected to pin 1. Pin 1 is just a tie point and should be connected to the on board coupling caps. But it looks like you just connected pin 1 to pin 8 to ground. If so... That's wrong and is causing the red plating because there is no negative bias on pin 5.
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by norburybrook »

sluckey wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:27 pm I think I see pin 5 of the 6V6s have a grid stopper connected to pin 1. Pin 1 is just a tie point and should be connected to the on board coupling caps. But it looks like you just connected pin 1 to pin 8 to ground. If so... That's wrong and is causing the red plating because there is no negative bias on pin 5.
Steve, i don't have pins 1 and 8 connected. You're correct that there's a grid stopper between 5 and 1. I have pin 8 going to ground now via 1R resistors.


M
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by martin manning »

I’d see if there is negative voltage on pin 5. Then with the rectifier in check the other power tube pins.
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by norburybrook »

martin manning wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:56 pm I’d see if there is negative voltage on pin 5. Then with the rectifier in check the other power tube pins.
I've spoted the problem :D I haven't connected pins 1 from the 6V6's to the grid leak resistors on the board!!!! Doh!



M
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by norburybrook »

LOL, well that was an oversight :D

Connected them up and everything is working. I have an Ay7 in the reverb and it's a bit weak so I need to change that, I've no idea what the pan is as it come out of an old Peavey but it's working and sounding nice just a bit quiet. The footswitch is working in reverse fro the reverb and trem but if I switch the cable connections at the amp end it makes a horrible noise and stops working.



The bias trem is very subtle but I've a feeling once the bias is set right that may change...so...

I have a B+ at the 6V6 grid of 398vDC what should I bias at in mV for JJ 6V6's ?


edit: it seems with around 400V DC plate voltage 19mA is the maximum safe bias voltage. I will set accordingly tomorrow and report back.
IMG_20190621_190453.jpg
IMG_20190621_190446.jpg







M
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by norburybrook on Fri Jun 21, 2019 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by martin manning »

JJ 6V6S are a beefier tube than a 6V6GT. 14W. So you could set them at say no more than 0.7*14/398 = 25 mA. Recheck the plate voltage and see where you end up. You could go a a couple of mA cooler and see what it sounds like.
sluckey
Posts: 3528
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:48 pm
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: Princeton reverb build in a trainwreck chassis

Post by sluckey »

norburybrook wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2019 6:02 pm The footswitch is working in reverse fro the reverb and trem but if I switch the cable connections at the amp end it makes a horrible noise and stops working.
The connection to the reverb FS must be shielded but the connection to the trem FS does not have to be shielded. So, if you have a typical Fender two button FS, you need to swap connections at the FS end. May be easier to just swap the switches around.

Or, you could swap the connections INSIDE the amp if your layout permits.
Post Reply