Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Express, Liverpool, Rocket, Dirty Little Monster, etc.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
BBQLS1
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:01 am
Location: Red Stick, LA

Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by BBQLS1 »

I'm really wanting to build a TWC of some type. I had been reading that the Express was very much a lead machine and the Liverpool was close, but lower power and cleans up better.

I've built a 36W and a few 18Wers and find the 36 to be about right volume wise, but I like run the amp at about 2 o'clock (master and volume) and roll back my guitar volume for cleans. I might run a TW at a lower setting on the volume dial, but it might be full volume earlier. I figure the Liverpool wattage wise will be very close volume wise to my 36, but I might need more juice for cleans?

Is the Liverpool more flexible than the Express?
How different is the volume?

Thanks for your input!
User avatar
dartanion
Posts: 1562
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:02 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by dartanion »

There is not that much difference in output:

Liverpool is about 30W
Express is about 35W

To me, I think it's more of a preference thing. Fixed bias EL34s vs. cathode biased EL84s.

Build them both, then decide :D
Eardrums!!! We don't need no stinkin' eardrums!
BBQLS1
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:01 am
Location: Red Stick, LA

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by BBQLS1 »

dartanion wrote:There is not that much difference in output:

Liverpool is about 30W
Express is about 35W

To me, I think it's more of a preference thing. Fixed bias EL34s vs. cathode biased EL84s.

Build them both, then decide :D
Really? I was thinking the Express would be more like 50W!

I probably will build both eventually, but want this one to be a usable amp. I might just do the express anyways since all my amps are EL84 based.
tubedogsmith
Posts: 597
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:52 pm

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by tubedogsmith »

If you use a strat or a tele, an efficient speaker and know how to use your volume control either one would work great and you could even use a few pedals maybe.
User avatar
geetarpicker
Posts: 918
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:08 pm
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by geetarpicker »

The Liverpool can be even brighter than an Express, and doesn't have as much lows either. The volume difference is about 1-2db which is noticable but either amp would be considered loud these days. Still, back in the mid 90s most of the time I couldn't use my Liverpool onstage because I couldn't get quite enough volume to get over the drummer especially when rolled back for cleans. However folks these days though expect the guitar lower onstage, even if the drummer is an animal. That said, I found I could get slightly louder clean tones with my Express.

I also feel the Express is more versatile because you can use so many different types of output tubes, EL34/6CA7, 6L6, 6V6, 5881, KT66, KT88, 6550, etc. With the 6V6 tubes you can get the power down to even less than a Liverpool puts out.
Last edited by geetarpicker on Mon Nov 05, 2007 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mlp-mx6
Posts: 1111
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 4:24 pm
Location: NW Atlanta

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by mlp-mx6 »

geetarpicker wrote:With the 6V6 tubes you can get the power down to even less than a Liverpool puts out.
BUT IT IS STILL FREAKIN' LOUD! (grin - ears ringing from a 6V6 Express...)
Wife: How many amps do you need?
Me: Just one more...
BBQLS1
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:01 am
Location: Red Stick, LA

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by BBQLS1 »

Cool, it sounds like I'll start with an Express.

Thanks Guys!
User avatar
drhulsey
Posts: 986
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:19 am

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by drhulsey »

BBQLS1 wrote: Cool, it sounds like I'll start with an Express.
I used my Express clone for the first time at a gig recently. It held up nicely against a loud drummer and 3 horns. We do mic the guitar amp. There was plenty of clean headroom for all the softer stuff we do and plenty of growl for the heavier stuff. I DO plan a Liverpool build next. We'll see 8)
mlp-mx6 wrote: BUT IT IS STILL FREAKIN' LOUD!
What's that :?: I can't hear you for the ringing in my ears from our last gig :shock:
Tim

In case the NSA is listening, KMA!
BBQLS1
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:01 am
Location: Red Stick, LA

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by BBQLS1 »

drhulsey wrote:
BBQLS1 wrote: Cool, it sounds like I'll start with an Express.
I used my Express clone for the first time at a gig recently. It held up nicely against a loud drummer and 3 horns. We do mic the guitar amp. There was plenty of clean headroom for all the softer stuff we do and plenty of growl for the heavier stuff. I DO plan a Liverpool build next. We'll see 8)
Cool. What layout/schematic to use?
paulster
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:08 pm
Location: Los Angeles & London

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by paulster »

BBQLS1 wrote:What layout/schematic to use?
Schematic: http://users.zoominternet.net/~jdhall/a ... evised.JPG
Layout: https://tubeamparchive.com/download/file.php?id=501

Note that some of the values on the layout (mid/presence pots, 9.1K dropping resistors, etc.) are slightly different from the schematic. Use the schematic values.

Paul
User avatar
DerStever
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 11:02 am
Location: TN

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by DerStever »

I have both - pix are here although I redid the label job on the back of the Liverpool - it was messy.

http://www.etxmusic.org/amps/derstevers_disrupters.htm

I really like the L-Pool a tad better - it has a creamier distortion with a definate British Vibe to it which I love - the Express seems to be a more agressive sounding amp - more versatile but no matter what OT you use its still agressive. Its simply what you like personally, you cant go wrong with either. My Express is destined to become L-Pool #2 (or maybe #1 if it sounds better than the other one) Ya never know. Some of the parts will be different so it won't sound exactly the same.

Someone mentioned bass response - there are lots of ways to increase that, like different speakers, cabinets, output tubes, cap voicing etc etc.

I like bright but not harsh and its what I'm getting. These are the best lead amps ever made.
User avatar
skyboltone
Posts: 2287
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Sparks, NV, where nowhere looks like home.

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by skyboltone »

I sure like the EL-84 holder inners better than the ones Antique Electronic Supply sells. Where did you get those?

Dan H
The Last of the World's Great Human Beings
Seek immediate medical attention if you suddenly go either deaf or blind.
If you put the Federal Government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years time there would be a shortage of sand.
User avatar
drhulsey
Posts: 986
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:19 am

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by drhulsey »

DerStever wrote: Someone mentioned bass response...
I was pleasantly surprised by the amount of bass response out of my Express. I didn't expect so much 8)
Great looking amps, BTW. I like that open work in the front panel. I may have to try that on mine, with due credit of course :wink:
Tim

In case the NSA is listening, KMA!
User avatar
DerStever
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 11:02 am
Location: TN

Re: Is a Liverpool really more usable than an Express?

Post by DerStever »

The EL84 holders are Niks.

Thanks the open work was borrowed from another amp company - I liked it so I used it - its not a direct copy but close.
Post Reply