huge voltage differencies

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
User avatar
mat
Posts: 929
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:52 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

huge voltage differencies

Post by mat »

I swapped different tubes on V1 on my HRM build. I was amazed how much different tube affects the plate voltages (and sound).

Svetlana 12ax7 188,200
EH 12ax7 194,195
Tungsol 12ax7 197,194?
JJecc81 153,153 !??
JJecc81(another) 154,150 !!??
Sovtek 12ax7 200,205
Haltron ecc83 163,150 !!!!??

Best sounding was the Sovtek. But with low notes the amp gave whispering hissing sound and with chop stick method the problem appeared to be the Sovtek :(
The Haltron seems to be faulty.
mat
dogears
Posts: 1902
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:29 pm

Re: huge voltage differencies

Post by dogears »

Mat,

ECC81 (12AT7) tubes draw much more current, hence the 150v plates. Seems the Haltron is really a 12at7??

If the Sovtek sounds best, something is still wrong with the build! :cry:
Normster
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:26 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: huge voltage differencies

Post by Normster »

I experienced the same thing, Mat. I tried China, JJ, EH, Mullard RI, and Tung Sol...huge difference in plate readings on each. The closest voltage readings I got to the "ideal" were with the EH's.
User avatar
mat
Posts: 929
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:52 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: huge voltage differencies

Post by mat »

dogears wrote:Mat,

ECC81 (12AT7) tubes draw much more current, hence the 150v plates. Seems the Haltron is really a 12at7??

If the Sovtek sounds best, something is still wrong with the build! :cry:
Yes, I know the ECC81 takes more juice but I didn't know it affects that much to the plate voltage (always learning).

I got today the KT77's and new Sovtek (high gain) and one goldpin Tungsol which is the favourite tube on V1 now for me. The JJKT77's give fuller sound than EL34's but I think when I get the amp running properly all the tubes will play bigger role on the sound of the amp. :evil: :evil: This is starting to be a bit frustrated not to know where I have made an error :evil: :evil: :evil:

I will check all the voltages again tomorrow....
mat
Zippy
Posts: 2052
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:18 pm

Re: huge voltage differencies

Post by Zippy »

mat wrote:Yes, I know the ECC81 takes more juice but I didn't know it affects that much to the plate voltage (always learning).
"more juice" translates to greater current flow across the plate resistor, hence more voltage drop (the good ol' V=RI).
User avatar
mat
Posts: 929
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:52 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: huge voltage differencies

Post by mat »

Zippy wrote:
mat wrote:Yes, I know the ECC81 takes more juice but I didn't know it affects that much to the plate voltage (always learning).
"more juice" translates to greater current flow across the plate resistor, hence more voltage drop (the good ol' V=RI).
Yes, that is what I meant :shock: Shouldn't try to be too fancy with the language that is not the one of my mothers :D :D :D :D
mat
User avatar
mat
Posts: 929
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:52 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: huge voltage differencies

Post by mat »

Normster wrote:I experienced the same thing, Mat. I tried China, JJ, EH, Mullard RI, and Tung Sol...huge difference in plate readings on each. The closest voltage readings I got to the "ideal" were with the EH's.
Ok. Seems like Bob-I prefers the EH also on V1&V2. Would anyone else like to tell their favourite tubes on V1&V2 ?

Would be nice to know if HAD had an favourite tubes for the V1 and V2. Or did he choose them individually depending of the player. I just talked with someone who has built and serviced alot of amps and has been selling tubes for a long time that the plate voltages can differ quite a lot between the same type tubes also..
mat
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: huge voltage differencies

Post by Bob-I »

mat wrote:
Normster wrote:I experienced the same thing, Mat. I tried China, JJ, EH, Mullard RI, and Tung Sol...huge difference in plate readings on each. The closest voltage readings I got to the "ideal" were with the EH's.
Ok. Seems like Bob-I prefers the EH also on V1&V2. Would anyone else like to tell their favourite tubes on V1&V2 ?
I'd like to try the Tungsol and Mullards though.
ampgeek
Posts: 1009
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 1:31 am

Re: huge voltage differencies

Post by ampgeek »

Although I am still "whoring" around my D'Lite (ala Bogen) trying to figure out what speaker(s) and speaker configuration works the best for me, I have "played" around with the following 12AX7 types in V1 and V2:

EH-new
Telefunken-NOS
Mullard-NOS
Amperex-NOS
RCA (5751)-NOS (Black plate, 3 mica)
RCA (7025)-NOS

In all cases, the same type occupied V1 and V2 (e.g., have not crossed brand/types as of yet). A new EH was in V3 for all. I was plugged into a MB DC-3 1X12 cab with Celestion Vintage 30 (which I know isn't "optimum"). I was just trying to find the best arrangement for the speaker/cab that I had on my work bench before going out and trying others.

So far, the Telefunkens sounded the best to my ear with NOS Tung-Sol 5881's in the output section while playing my '72 Les Paul Deluxe (mini HB).

The sonic character amongst those "tested" varied significantly in some cases and very little in others. However, none sounded bad.

This was all done in a "wham-bam-thank you mam" fashion so I don't have any voltages or subjective tone descriptions to report. And...it may very well change once the final speaker type and arrangement is decided upon.

Dave O.
User avatar
mat
Posts: 929
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:52 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: huge voltage differencies

Post by mat »

thanks for the info ampgeek 8)
mat
Post Reply