Perhaps by now you are more confident in your soldering skills.M Fowler wrote:I have only replaced two pups in my whole 55 years of life. I have always wanted to try out different types but never did.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Perhaps by now you are more confident in your soldering skills.M Fowler wrote:I have only replaced two pups in my whole 55 years of life. I have always wanted to try out different types but never did.


I can happen that way. It depends on how good or bad the old and new pickups are. I could say the same thing about speakers, strings, etc... You have to have a decent idea about what you are dealing with before you make the change. Sometimes that is hard to figure out.What gets me is how many times I have replaced pickups only to find there wasn't much change or difference from the old one.......
Usually the difference becomes more apparent when you crank up the amp and push some power through it but for just goofing around it can seem like the money you just spent could have gone to something more worthwhile...

I think my tastes are very different then yours but here's what I learned:vibratoking wrote:I've tried quite a few pickups as well. To stay with the original thread...I like the Fralin bridge 5% over and the stock neck for the Tele. My original Tele pickups sounded decent, not great, and they were microphonic as well. The Fralins are quiet and sound very good.
diagrammatiks - care to share any conclusions about all the pickups you tested? Although, I hate to derail the original thread. I have tried a few humbuckers too.
... or the binding 'round the body.boldaslove6789 wrote:Well today I took possession of the Telecaster 2day.
I got to finally take the Neck off and inspect the guitar more. Turns out the guitar is not a 58' like the original owner thought it was. I should have known by the larger 60's style logo...
Very cool!diagrammatiks wrote:I think my tastes are very different then yours but here's what I learned:vibratoking wrote:I've tried quite a few pickups as well. To stay with the original thread...I like the Fralin bridge 5% over and the stock neck for the Tele. My original Tele pickups sounded decent, not great, and they were microphonic as well. The Fralins are quiet and sound very good.
diagrammatiks - care to share any conclusions about all the pickups you tested? Although, I hate to derail the original thread. I have tried a few humbuckers too.
I think the most important thing is finding the right pairing of the pickup and the wood/resonance of the guitar.
I've had pickups that I didn't really like at all one guitar that sounded completely amazing in another. Also, almost every aftermarket pair I've tried has been better then anything stock that my guitars came with, gibson burstbuckers, classics, prs hfs, archop pups, mira pickups etc.
my favorites so far...
les paul style mahogony with a maple cap - bg pickups - hellabucker bridge/smokestack neck. Almost everything else I've tried in the les pauls I've owned have bene really bland. The Bg pups have a perfect balance between highs and lows.
prs hollowbody spruce - the original 10k archtop pups made this guitar way to bright. I have a pair of bareknuckle warpigs with ceramic magnets in there now. It's the only way to get the guitar to work for me. It's a spruce on mahogany hollowbody so the unplugged sound of the guitar is already way to bright.
Ibanez S style thinner slab mahogony - bareknuckle nailbombs. I didn't like the nailbombs in any other guitar I tried them and was looking to sell them until I got the S and decided to throw them in. Night and day difference, really brought out the highs and mids that the guitar needed since it's pretty dark to begin with.
How about a Callaham compensated bridge?wicker wrote:I've got question guys, I've changed strings from 10-52 to 11-54 on my Tele, and I like them, but I've got problem with setting the scale right, I've got nearly C on 12 fret of B string...
Someone suggested me changing bridge, from classic (3 saddles) to modern 6 saddles. Now I'm a bit confused about that, I know that bridge is really important in Tele, and have heard that changing it will change tone too, what do you think ?
Yeah, the Callaham bridge is pretty close, but not as perfect on intonation as you can get a 6-saddle bridge. I settled for the Callaham because of not wanting to change the Tele tone too much.rogb wrote:How about a Callaham compensated bridge?wicker wrote:I've got question guys, I've changed strings from 10-52 to 11-54 on my Tele, and I like them, but I've got problem with setting the scale right, I've got nearly C on 12 fret of B string...
Someone suggested me changing bridge, from classic (3 saddles) to modern 6 saddles. Now I'm a bit confused about that, I know that bridge is really important in Tele, and have heard that changing it will change tone too, what do you think ?
http://www.callahamguitars.com/partstel.htm
See halfway down
Callaham 3 Slant Compensated Tele Saddles $37