Rocket vs. Lightning
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Rocket vs. Lightning
They're both top-boost derived I know
How do they differ/compare? Other than two extra power tubes of course
Cheers!
How do they differ/compare? Other than two extra power tubes of course
Cheers!
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
IMHO:
Rocket=high quality sushi
Lightning=frozen fish sticks
The Rocket has chime and swirl, and the smoothest breakup around. Awesome amp. The Lightning is OK, a nice amp, but nothing that will cause you to run home from work each day to play it.
YMMV
Rocket=high quality sushi
Lightning=frozen fish sticks
The Rocket has chime and swirl, and the smoothest breakup around. Awesome amp. The Lightning is OK, a nice amp, but nothing that will cause you to run home from work each day to play it.
YMMV
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
A TW Rocket 36w is a better amp for sure.
But I lke my Marshall 18w, my Spitfire 18w and my Rocket 18w there all different from each other and all worth having around.
Mark
But I lke my Marshall 18w, my Spitfire 18w and my Rocket 18w there all different from each other and all worth having around.
Mark
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
Aww man! I've been loving my fish sticks. Now you telling me I gotta try that raw fish?
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
I know that they are different beasts (pre amp tubes etc)...however, I was wondering how the TW Rocket 36w and Dr. Z Stangray compare?
Thanks,
Rob
Thanks,
Rob
Music is an expression of the inexpressable ~ Vernon Reid, Musician.
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
haha I'm sure the Rocket is a better sounding amp
I'm just curious about the difference in design/schematics?
How do they differ? and compare?
Let's say someone has a lightning and they want to convert it to a half powered Rocket?
I'm just curious about the difference in design/schematics?
How do they differ? and compare?
Let's say someone has a lightning and they want to convert it to a half powered Rocket?
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
Some differences:
Lightning uses parallel triodes in the first stage.
Lightning uses a bypass cap on second stage (after volume pot).
Lightning has Master instead of Cut
Some cap value differences making the Rocket brighter overall.
And maybe the main differences - the power supply and both trannies.
Lightning uses parallel triodes in the first stage.
Lightning uses a bypass cap on second stage (after volume pot).
Lightning has Master instead of Cut
Some cap value differences making the Rocket brighter overall.
And maybe the main differences - the power supply and both trannies.
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
I have a Top-Boost style single channel amp that uses 2 el84's and I want to convert it to a half powered rocket.sliberty wrote:Some differences:
Lightning uses parallel triodes in the first stage.
Lightning uses a bypass cap on second stage (after volume pot).
Lightning has Master instead of Cut
Some cap value differences making the Rocket brighter overall.
And maybe the main differences - the power supply and both trannies.
It already has a .0047 cut control and I did away with the crossline type master. I'll probably install a Larmar or go with scaling
So i need to change the first triode stage and some other components as well as the power supply?
I'm going to use the same tranny's, they're typical ac15ish iron
Doesn't seem too bad!
Anyone done anything like this?
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
I have both amps...but only one gz34
where is the gz34?...in the rocket!
where is the gz34?...in the rocket!
This message has been printed using 100% recycled electrons.
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
Speaking of the lightning,i've tried a few, and i just never liked them that much. Some do like them. I'd have a Rocket over them any day.
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
I'm sure the Rocket is a much better sounding circuit
That's why i think I'm going to take the Lightning inspired amp and make it a lot more of a Rocket inspired amp
Will the half-powered Rocket power supply be adequate for an extra ef86 channel?
That's why i think I'm going to take the Lightning inspired amp and make it a lot more of a Rocket inspired amp
Will the half-powered Rocket power supply be adequate for an extra ef86 channel?
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
I think some have used the parallel triode (lightning similar) first stage in rockets with great results.
As far as the additional current draw of an ef86, I'm not sure. I probably should have checked that before I stuck one in my rocket...
So far, so great, though!
As far as the additional current draw of an ef86, I'm not sure. I probably should have checked that before I stuck one in my rocket...
So far, so great, though!
This message has been printed using 100% recycled electrons.
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
You have an ef86 channel in your rocket?KellyBass wrote:I think some have used the parallel triode (lightning similar) first stage in rockets with great results.
As far as the additional current draw of an ef86, I'm not sure. I probably should have checked that before I stuck one in my rocket...![]()
So far, so great, though!
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
I built a Rocket from scratch and it was fine. I see it as what it is: a refined Top boost ac-30. It has no dramatic changes except the power supply. The supply voltage is lower and the filtering higher. I expect that was done to support the current drain at the lower voltage.
Since the the Stang-ray is the older vox AC30 circuit there is a strong resemblance in the power supply.
I added the pentode channel but wasn't happy until I put a dual voltage switch on the two taps on the power transformer. I now have 300v and 350v (approx) at the flick of a switch. Both preamps are happy.
The Rocket gets it specified power supply and the pentode channel gets it's extra voltages when needed.The pentode, I use a 6BR7, still sounds OK at Rocket voltage but shines with the higher voltage plus the added current storage of the Rocket power supply. Think pentode mostly clean and Rocket gritty to infinity..... and beyond?
The extra preamp tube falls well within the Toneslut / Heyboer PT current capacity. These are monster transformers.
Since the the Stang-ray is the older vox AC30 circuit there is a strong resemblance in the power supply.
I added the pentode channel but wasn't happy until I put a dual voltage switch on the two taps on the power transformer. I now have 300v and 350v (approx) at the flick of a switch. Both preamps are happy.
The Rocket gets it specified power supply and the pentode channel gets it's extra voltages when needed.The pentode, I use a 6BR7, still sounds OK at Rocket voltage but shines with the higher voltage plus the added current storage of the Rocket power supply. Think pentode mostly clean and Rocket gritty to infinity..... and beyond?
The extra preamp tube falls well within the Toneslut / Heyboer PT current capacity. These are monster transformers.
Heavens, an unused PI input !
Re: Rocket vs. Lightning
Basically same as building the Vox AC 15 EF86 preamp can up that to 30-36w or keep it with two EL84 power section.
Mark
Mark