Balance resistors in series filtering
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
-
azatplayer
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:59 pm
- Location: Great Southland
Balance resistors in series filtering
WHat determines the right value here?
Typically see either 100k or 220k used. SOmetimes 270k.
Im about to build a Naylor SD60, just love what ive heard of its tones, seems anyone that owns one, rates them highly.
Looking at the filtering vs the B+ they run, around 500V, and have two choices.
Go for spec which was using 300V caps in series first and second nodes, they used Illinois, i would go FnT.
OR use say, Nichicon or Panasonic radials. Small footprint and great spec.
Question is more for the preamp caps. Theres just no 500V small radials, 22uf value.
So, i m thinking using series in that end as well, pair of 47uf radials each stage, and use balance resistors.
Im thinking at this point, its only the preamp current, so figure on 1 watt balancers. But wondering how critical the resistor value is?
100K ok? Or should i go higher?
Typically see either 100k or 220k used. SOmetimes 270k.
Im about to build a Naylor SD60, just love what ive heard of its tones, seems anyone that owns one, rates them highly.
Looking at the filtering vs the B+ they run, around 500V, and have two choices.
Go for spec which was using 300V caps in series first and second nodes, they used Illinois, i would go FnT.
OR use say, Nichicon or Panasonic radials. Small footprint and great spec.
Question is more for the preamp caps. Theres just no 500V small radials, 22uf value.
So, i m thinking using series in that end as well, pair of 47uf radials each stage, and use balance resistors.
Im thinking at this point, its only the preamp current, so figure on 1 watt balancers. But wondering how critical the resistor value is?
100K ok? Or should i go higher?
-
azatplayer
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:59 pm
- Location: Great Southland
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
I did my express using small radials, also did my JTM50 using them. Oh and my AC15.. I guess i dig the look and theyre cheap and high spec and take up little space.
- VacuumVoodoo
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:27 pm
- Location: Goteborg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
Look in datasheet for the caps you intend to use. Check specs for leakage current.
Calculate resistor so the current through it is at least 5x spec'd leakage (voltage across cap/leakage current).
Calculate resistor power rating to 3x power dissipated in it.
You may discover it's often not what is commonly found in amps.
Calculate resistor so the current through it is at least 5x spec'd leakage (voltage across cap/leakage current).
Calculate resistor power rating to 3x power dissipated in it.
You may discover it's often not what is commonly found in amps.
Aleksander Niemand
------------------------
Life's a party but you get invited only once...
affiliation:TUBEWONDER AMPS
Zagray!-review
------------------------
Life's a party but you get invited only once...
affiliation:TUBEWONDER AMPS
Zagray!-review
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
VV, I am looking at a datasheet for a 47uF/630V cap where leakage is given as = 3*SQRT(C*V) uA at 5 mins
I assume a 47uF means,
3sqrt(0.000047*630) = 0.5mA
assuming 500V at the node and two caps in series, 250v across each cap, 250/(0.5mA*5)=100k/1W resistor
What does the @ 5 minutes mean? Did I follow your advice correctly? TIA
I assume a 47uF means,
3sqrt(0.000047*630) = 0.5mA
assuming 500V at the node and two caps in series, 250v across each cap, 250/(0.5mA*5)=100k/1W resistor
What does the @ 5 minutes mean? Did I follow your advice correctly? TIA
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
Surf, I think you are a decimal point off on the 47uF. Micro meaning millionth.
It should be .00000047, right?
I know there is math to figure it out but if you look at existing amps with balance resistors, they are typically 220K-270K.
Not only do they balance the voltage between the two caps, they also act as bleeder resistors when you power down, draining the filter caps.
47000000
It should be .00000047, right?
I know there is math to figure it out but if you look at existing amps with balance resistors, they are typically 220K-270K.
Not only do they balance the voltage between the two caps, they also act as bleeder resistors when you power down, draining the filter caps.
47000000
Tom
Don't let that smoke out!
Don't let that smoke out!
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
No, this is 470nF. Surf is right.Structo wrote:It should be .00000047, right?
- VacuumVoodoo
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:27 pm
- Location: Goteborg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
Use actual voltage that will be present on the cap, not it's rated working voltage in the first formula. In this case 250 instead of 630.surfsup wrote:VV, I am looking at a datasheet for a 47uF/630V cap where leakage is given as = 3*SQRT(C*V) uA at 5 mins
I assume a 47uF means,
3sqrt(0.000047*630) = 0.5mA
assuming 500V at the node and two caps in series, 250v across each cap, 250/(0.5mA*5)=100k/1W resistor
What does the @ 5 minutes mean? Did I follow your advice correctly? TIA
5mins means 5 minutes after application of voltage.
So, I(lk)=3sqrt(47e^-6*250)=325uA
This will give you R=~150k which means anything (within reason) up to 150k will be fine.
Power dissipation will ca 0.4W so at least 1W resistor, 2W if you want to be really conservative.
What capacitor brand/type is it?
Aleksander Niemand
------------------------
Life's a party but you get invited only once...
affiliation:TUBEWONDER AMPS
Zagray!-review
------------------------
Life's a party but you get invited only once...
affiliation:TUBEWONDER AMPS
Zagray!-review
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
Why isn't 47uF equal to 47 millionths of a Farad?roberto wrote:No, this is 470nF. Surf is right.Structo wrote:It should be .00000047, right?
10-6 is micro
47x10-6 or is it 47x10-7?
Now I'm confused
Tom
Don't let that smoke out!
Don't let that smoke out!
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
Because 1µ is .000001 then you have to multiply by 47 and it's .000047.
You wrote 47 after six zeros.
You wrote 47 after six zeros.
-
dcribbs1412
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:56 pm
- Location: Arizona Desert
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
Cool ideaazatplayer wrote: Question is more for the preamp caps. Theres just no 500V small radials, 22uf value.
So, i m thinking using series in that end as well, pair of 47uf radials each stage, and use balance resistors.
are you going use one long board for PS and preamp(like Naylor) or build a separate PS board?
Darin
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
Any special considerations when the series caps are used in an "economy" power supply (where the secondary center tap is connected between the two caps)? Marshall used no resistors; Fender sometimes used 100K, sometimes 39K.
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
Well, that way you have your PT's secondary windings that discharge those supply caps.
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
Alex,
Thanks for sharing that formula - really useful, if even to check the traditional values commonly used with new caps.
Azatplayer, of course you don't need 500vdc caps after the PI, I'd just use inexpensive 22uf/450v radial Nichicons. I don't think the short time the amp is ever unloaded will hurt the caps.
And if you're going with the high oringinal B+, I'd stick with the stock Sovtek "5881"WXTs, which can handle the punishment. Same reason Soldano uses them.
Can't wait to see the amp!
Thanks for sharing that formula - really useful, if even to check the traditional values commonly used with new caps.
Azatplayer, of course you don't need 500vdc caps after the PI, I'd just use inexpensive 22uf/450v radial Nichicons. I don't think the short time the amp is ever unloaded will hurt the caps.
And if you're going with the high oringinal B+, I'd stick with the stock Sovtek "5881"WXTs, which can handle the punishment. Same reason Soldano uses them.
Can't wait to see the amp!
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
Some safety codes require that high voltage bleed off to a "safe" value (10% ?) within 5 min.surfsup wrote:What does the @ 5 minutes mean? Did I follow your advice correctly? TIA
RedDog Steve
Re: Balance resistors in series filtering
Ok yea i get 154k...so can you explain the reason for the 5 times multiplier for the current?
Structo, just move the decimal over 6 places, so 47uF w the decimal after the 7 means 4 zeros...
EDIT rdjones, thx
Structo, just move the decimal over 6 places, so 47uF w the decimal after the 7 means 4 zeros...
EDIT rdjones, thx
Last edited by surfsup on Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.