Transformer Confusion

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
User avatar
jon
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:45 pm
Location: North East

Transformer Confusion

Post by jon »

Has anyone used the Weber WPTGP Transformer? I am not sure how they are spec'ing the secondaries. I have attached a picture for the wiring offered.

[IMG:542:460]http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j250/ ... TGPsch.jpg[/img]
Cliff Schecht
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:32 am
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Transformer Confusion

Post by Cliff Schecht »

What don't you get? You attach the higher voltage tap to the top of the bridge rectifier (the 4-diode dealy) and the lower voltage tap to the bottom of the rectifier. Depending on the difference between the voltages going to the top and bottom of the rectifier you will get different output voltages, all that can handle 150mA of current.

For example: 690-370=320*1.414=~450V B+
620-70=550*1.414=770V B+
370-70=300*1.414=~420V B+
410-0=410*1.414=580V B+
690-410=280*1.414=395V B+
690-0=690*1.414=975V B+ (:shock:)

The differential voltage that you choose will determine the final B+ voltage. Lots of options available here..
Cliff Schecht - Circuit P.I.
rhinson
Posts: 395
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:45 pm
Location: memphis

Re: Transformer Confusion

Post by rhinson »

what cliff said: lots of options---pick a section to see if it fits your needs---the examples weber gives would be some good common ones. with the first one (320vac) you still have the 0-70 left over and you could also bridge that one for a bias supply. and since there's a 5v winding you can use a tube rect as the front diodes of the bridge. lots of options here. rh
marcoloco961
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:07 pm
Location: Colona, Il. U.S.

Re: Transformer Confusion

Post by marcoloco961 »

I really like that transformer. Very versatile.
User avatar
jon
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:45 pm
Location: North East

Re: Transformer Confusion

Post by jon »

marcoloco961 wrote:I really like that transformer. Very versatile.
So you've used it then?
User avatar
David Root
Posts: 3540
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Location: Chilliwack BC

Re: Transformer Confusion

Post by David Root »

Part of the question may be that it's not designed for conventional full wave operation eg 320-0-320. Only FW bridge, for which it is very versatile.
marcoloco961
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:07 pm
Location: Colona, Il. U.S.

Re: Transformer Confusion

Post by marcoloco961 »

jon wrote:
marcoloco961 wrote:I really like that transformer. Very versatile.
So you've used it then?
No sir, I have never used this one. I just thought it would be a handy one to have around as it can be used in many different builds.
Post Reply