Princeton Reverb Trouble

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

RightLurker
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by RightLurker »

I'v just completed some work on a fairly beat BF PR - all new electrolytics (all the filter caps had been previously changed to 80mf - now they are back to the original 40mf), installation of an adjustable bias circuit, addition of 470 ohm 1 watt screen resistors, all new JJ tubes, and a 3 wire power cord. I have biased the power tubes.

The amp is a disaster. It sounds okay with the volume at 3 or below, but above that it puts out an ugly, harsh, brittle distorted tone, and up around 7 the low notes are followed by an ungodly fluctuating, kazoo-like wail. This isn't a sound that's on top of the note - it's a sound the amp is driven to make all on it's own after the guitar strings are muted.

Any ideas on what I'm dealing with here? Inadequate filtering? Parasitic oscillation? Any suggestions from those of you who know what you're doing (clearly I don') would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

RL
RightLurker
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by RightLurker »

A correction to my initial post - the filter caps are 20mf, not 40mf. 20mf is the original specification. I should also mention that I've run the amp through two different speaker cabinets, and the problem was the same with both, so it's not the speaker.

RL
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by tubeswell »

RightLurker wrote:It sounds okay with the volume at 3 or below, but above that it puts out an ugly, harsh, brittle distorted tone, and up around 7 the low notes are followed by an ungodly fluctuating, kazoo-like wail. This isn't a sound that's on top of the note - it's a sound the amp is driven to make all on it's own after the guitar strings are muted.
I'm thinkin' microphonic tube(s) - did you try subbing/swapping the pre-amp tubes around?
RightLurker
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by RightLurker »

Thanks, Tubeswell. I'll give it a try - although I'm thinking something so simple would be too good to be true. Here's hopin'.

RL
User avatar
selloutrr
Posts: 3694
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:44 am
Location: Southern California

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by selloutrr »

tubes first, then
tested continuity to make sure you have all the proper grounds and cables tracing to the proper destinations.
look for bad solder joints.
then test components you may have a bad pot, resistor, or cap. it should be a quick fix.

I might be wrong but I'm understanding it as the whole amp is sounding bad? not just the reverb?

test the OT
and reverb Transformer while your at it.

shouldn't take 15 min to go threw the amp and once you know what is working you'll know where not to look :wink:
My Daughter Build Stone Henge
RightLurker
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by RightLurker »

The reverb (and trem) both work and sound fine - it's the amp as a whole. Thank you kindly for the advice - I'll see what I can find.
RightLurker
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by RightLurker »

Well I'll just be darned. It was a bad tube in the V1 position. The tube in question was a brand new JJ ECC83. I swapped in a 12AX7 stamped "Westinghouse - Made In Russia", the problem went away and the amp sounds great. Just for grins I put in a different, brand new JJ, and the problem came back. I tried some other, old/used ECC83/12AX7s that I have, and they all work fine. I've had great luck with JJs, so this is a surprise to me.

I have a pair of brand new JJ 6V6s in the amp, which I just biased. One tube bounces around between 20.3 to 20.7ma at 416 plate volts, and the other bounces between 18.5 to 19.0ma, also showing 416 plate volts. That works out to 8.528 and 7.779 watts, respectively, if my math is right. I don't know how well matched those numbers indicate the tubes are, but the amp sounds great.

My thanks to both you guys (and everyone else here).

RL
User avatar
selloutrr
Posts: 3694
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:44 am
Location: Southern California

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by selloutrr »

glad to help
My Daughter Build Stone Henge
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by Structo »

According to my calcs, 17ma is 60% and 20ma is 70%

That is using 12 watts as max.
The JJ's can probably do 14 watts without breaking a sweat.

Here is a nifty Excel program that Duncan Monro came up with.

Just enter your plate voltage and then the max power in watts, then click on the power chart and it will give low to high bias amounts.
Pretty slick.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
RightLurker
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by RightLurker »

Tom - that program looks like a fantastic tool. Unfortunately I can only look at the static image on this (Apple, non-Excel) computer, but tomorrow I'll download it on my office machine. Thanks for the help, everyone. This forum is great.

RL
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by tubeswell »

@RL - Just for your edification/ejamuckation, hold the known microphonic tube firmly near the base between your thumb and forefinger, and put it next to your ear and give it a good flick with one of your other fingernails. It should sound quite jangly/loose compared to a specimen of the same type of tube that is known to be not microphonic. (This works better with 9-pin pre-amp tubes). Why did I suggest this? (just for kicks?) Its a kinda spit test for potentially dodgy tubes.
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by iknowjohnny »

Tom, that doesn't take screen current into account, right? So i assume the 37ma i get at 475v/70% for el34's should equate to about 42ma on the meter. Thats what i've been using now.
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by Structo »

No it doesn't take in account screen current.

I don't usually mention that especially to newbies since it will only add to the confusion and it can act as a safety margin for the bias.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
iknowjohnny
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:10 am
Location: los angeles

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by iknowjohnny »

thanks.
RightLurker
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Princeton Reverb Trouble

Post by RightLurker »

I took Tubeswell's advice and tapped a known good ECC83S and a bad tube of the same type with fingernail while holding the tube close to my ear. The bad tube sounds like a little crystal bell - it goes "rrriinnnggggggg". Sort of like tapping the rim of a crystal drinking glass with a fork. The good tube, on the other hand, just makes a very solid "tink" sound - no ringing whatsoever. I actually got stuck with at least two brand new JJ ECC83S tubes that are bad like this. I've used JJ ECC83S tubes in the past without an issue. Could it just these are just from a bad batch or bad run?

Anyway, very interesting. Thanks for the tip, Tubeswell!

RL
Post Reply