What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply

If the component value is the same, is there any effect on the sound when using:

Resistors made of different materials?
45
23%
Old vs. new resistors of the same brand and materials?
9
5%
Different brands of resistors made of the same materials?
12
6%
Capacitors with different dielectric types?
46
23%
Different brands of capacitors with the same dielectric type?
14
7%
Capacitors with the same dielectric type but different construction?
22
11%
Check this box if you participated in the survey
49
25%
 
Total votes: 197

User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 10189
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by Reeltarded »

bepone wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2024 9:08 pm
Reeltarded wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:16 pm Caps, not resistors.
mostly correct .. but MF can also deteriorate sound

Misunderstood. The TS caps will almost always react differently because of the insanity that is induced right there.

A cranked plexi with a couple dB boost. A scientific instrument. Too many caveats and too many unargued variables.. so easy to find the lowest hanging fruit. Impossible to setup the deeper experiment. The method I described has been used by me for microphone placement, signal chain matching, pole testing 3rd devices.. everything.

The 'caps only' assertion was about identifying an easy test that will result in something obvious.

Of course resistors make a difference, just not this much.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by martin manning »

AFAIK noise is the only measurable quantity that differentiates resistors in this context, so either noise is somehow responsible for audio distortion, or there isn't anything to be heard other than the noise itself.
TUBEDUDE
Posts: 1864
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Mastersville

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by TUBEDUDE »

A second principle effect, like the residual 60Hz in the tweed Bassman affecting the tonality? I guess that can't be ruled out. I was thinking of noise as just noise. I should accept that things are seldom so simple.
Tube junkie that aspires to become a tri-state bidirectional buss driver.
User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 10189
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by Reeltarded »

Distortion.. how does your amp growl.

Listen to Nirvana All Apologies pre-roll. You hear tape, but you also hear the machine noise of several open tracks. When it plays on the radio I shiver. DSOTM in the most dynamic spaces has a different machine noise. It is not over-biased and it is a different tape formula. You can hear the mic pres and open mics.

Soundgarden. Blow Up the Outside half the recording is the machine idle noise. The drum sound is expected. You can hear it in the rests.You can hear the closest gobo and that the ceiling is dead and about 14'. (no wobble) It sounds like it looks. The room tone can make you gasp for air.

Bepone makes a specific point about MF. He is using it to fix a certain amount of reality dither. You want to defocus, but perfectly, and never too much. A little distortion in the right range is a primer for these adjectives; smooth, grunt, thump, growl, chime, gritty.. and others, plus the anti-species of the same. He frequently notes swapping a power string or a grid stop resistor out and the sound having a much more lively note and feel.

This is something he knows. It isn't a guess.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by martin manning »

Reeltarded wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 12:18 pm Distortion.. how does your amp growl.
Listen to Nirvana... Soundgarden...
Noise is measurable. So is harmonic distortion, which people might describe using various adjectives describing their subjective impression of the sound quality.
The nature and origin of resistor noise is well understood, and measurable. Show me where anyone has measured harmonic distortion produced by resistors that might be audible.
User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 10189
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by Reeltarded »

No! You show me!

You knew it would come to this. Embrace it.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by martin manning »

We've seen data that shows certain capacitor dielectrics produce distortion products. Resistors? Nothing yet.
WhopperPlate
Posts: 1127
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:04 am
Location: Santa Cruz, CA

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by WhopperPlate »

martin manning wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 8:46 am …or there isn't anything to be heard other than the noise itself.
Better answer than: “I can’t hear, feel, or measure a difference, therefore there is no difference, and everyone who perceives otherwise deserves an eye roll ”
Charlie
User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 10189
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by Reeltarded »

That is not what he said.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by martin manning »

Right. What I said was better.
R.G.
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:01 pm

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by R.G. »

WhopperPlate wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 3:56 pm Better answer than: “I can’t hear, feel, or measure a difference, therefore there is no difference, and everyone who perceives otherwise deserves an eye roll ”
Who exactly said that? :D
"It's not what we don't know that gets us in trouble. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
Mark Twain
TUBEDUDE
Posts: 1864
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Mastersville

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by TUBEDUDE »

Reeltarded wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 12:18 pm Distortion.. how does your amp growl.

Listen to Nirvana All Apologies pre-roll. You hear tape, but you also hear the machine noise of several open tracks. When it plays on the radio I shiver. DSOTM in the most dynamic spaces has a different machine noise. It is not over-biased and it is a different tape formula. You can hear the mic pres and open mics.

Soundgarden. Blow Up the Outside half the recording is the machine idle noise. The drum sound is expected. You can hear it in the rests.You can hear the closest gobo and that the ceiling is dead and about 14'. (no wobble) It sounds like it looks. The room tone can make you gasp for air.

Bepone makes a specific point about MF. He is using it to fix a certain amount of reality dither. You want to defocus, but perfectly, and never too much. A little distortion in the right range is a primer for these adjectives; smooth, grunt, thump, growl, chime, gritty.. and others, plus the anti-species of the same. He frequently notes swapping a power string or a grid stop resistor out and the sound having a much more lively note and feel.

This is something he knows. It isn't a guess.
Miles, you never dissapoint! "Reality Dither" That's my new favorite descriptor. And lately reality needs dithering, or more bias to calm it down a scosch.
Tube junkie that aspires to become a tri-state bidirectional buss driver.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by martin manning »

TUBEDUDE wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 9:57 pmAnd lately reality needs dithering, or more bias to calm it down a skosh.*
I think more negative feedback.

*from Japanese sukoshi [skoh shee] meaning "a tiny bit"
R.G.
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:01 pm

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by R.G. »

You know, I really thought this would taper off after the posting from the fellow who hears tonal differences from different AC line cords.

@ Whopperplate:
Do you accept that people can and have deceived themselves?

Try to keep it down to yes or no.
"It's not what we don't know that gets us in trouble. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
Mark Twain
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: What do you believe regarding the sound of passive components?

Post by martin manning »

A couple of folks here, including Charlie, have already admitted to twiddling a knob and perceiving that it was having some effect, and then discovering later that it was doing nothing. I will confess to being uncertain about a control having any effect when troubleshooting.
Post Reply