Amp porn - safe for work

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
gui_tarzan
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:10 am
Location: The 26th State

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by gui_tarzan »

I got the go-ahead from the shop (who called the owner) to replace whatever is needed. The owner knows what it's worth, but he wants to use it as long as he has the original parts back.

My knowledge of KT66 tubes is limited, I'm leaning toward the Tung-Sol replacements but I'll take advice in this area.

I did finally get more information, he said it was popping and crackling when he tried to play it. Could be jacks, caps, tubes or connections but it'll be a fun journey finding out.
--Jim

"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
User avatar
jelle
Posts: 2391
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by jelle »

Shuguang KT66 is my current fav.
User avatar
gktamps
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by gktamps »

I'm using Valve Arts and really like them.

On sale now, too.

http://www.tubesandmore.com/products/T-KT66-VA
matt h
Posts: 1224
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 2:26 am
Location: New England

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by matt h »

(deleted)
Last edited by matt h on Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jelle
Posts: 2391
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by jelle »

Yes, they are. It is what I used in this one: https://tubeamparchive.com/viewtopic.php?t=25536
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by martin manning »

gui_tarzan wrote:I got the go-ahead from the shop (who called the owner) to replace whatever is needed. The owner knows what it's worth, but he wants to use it as long as he has the original parts back. ... I did finally get more information, he said it was popping and crackling when he tried to play it. Could be jacks, caps, tubes or connections but it'll be a fun journey finding out.
Are you still going to try to reform the caps? If so a couple of things to consider if you want to try to reform them in situ:

With a vacuum rectifier you won't get any DC until the rectifier's filament is up to some minimum temperature, and if you are going to use very low line voltage to start the reforming process this is a problem. You can get around it by substituting in a Copper Cap or putting temporary silicon rectifiers on the rectifier socket.

You can use full or only slightly reduced line voltage by placing a resistor (say 100k 3W, or 220k 2W) across the standby switch (and leaving the switch open) to limit the current to a couple of mA. Monitor the voltage across the resistor and on the reservoir over time (several hours) to see how successful you are, and also to make sure that you don't exceed the max voltage rating on any of the filters. A bulb limiter or a variac could be used initially to reduce the line voltage a bit for some safety margin. I have heard that if the caps have been exposed to full voltage before reforming, then the chance of success is much reduced.
User avatar
cbass
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 6:17 pm
Location: Between Pomona & Bakersfield

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by cbass »

I thought reforming only worked if the cap hasn't seen some voltage for quiet some time like years . I have had some success reforming caps before in amps that hadn't been turned on or hadn't worked for a Kong time
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by martin manning »

That's what I heard too, but I don't know the science behind it or if there is some way to get around it. Maybe someone here does?
User avatar
gui_tarzan
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:10 am
Location: The 26th State

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by gui_tarzan »

After I spoke to the shop owner yesterday it sounds like the owner had been using it (though I don't know how often) so it has had power put to it recently. At this point I'm going to do what he wants, get it working. I'll replace the caps and any needed tubes (like the rectifier that I can see is bad) and we'll go from there.
--Jim

"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
Firestorm
Posts: 3033
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:34 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by Firestorm »

martin manning wrote:That's what I heard too, but I don't know the science behind it or if there is some way to get around it. Maybe someone here does?
Me too. If the amp has been running for a few hours recently, the caps are as reformed as they'll ever be. Some sites claim that reforming restores the oxide layer on the foil, but I don't think that seems possible. The aluminum oxide dielectric is deposited on the foil before construction using very high voltage and proprietary chemical goop. The reforming after assembly is just to ensure that the electrolyte migrates everywhere, especially coating weld points and other unoxidized areas. If the electrolyte has dried up past a certain point, there's nothing that can be done. You can judge the health of a cap (to a point) by putting a current-limiting resistor in series with the anode. Once the cap is charged, there should be very little current through it, hence very little voltage drop across the resistor. If the current stays up, the cap is pretty much done.
Roe
Posts: 1918
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by Roe »

to form filter caps remove tubes and add 100k 1-2w over standby switch. change caps if the voltage doesn't drop to 5-10V across the 100k.

TAD and F&T sells new 16+32uf 500v caps. the filter caps influence the tone and response noticeably
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
Roe
Posts: 1918
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by Roe »

gui_tarzan wrote:Every single resistor checks out within tolerance. How often does THAT happen on an amp this old??? I like it!
not uncommon with old marshalls. marshall generally used more CF than CC resistors in the 60s.
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
User avatar
gui_tarzan
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:10 am
Location: The 26th State

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by gui_tarzan »

As you can see my changes were very minimal - filter, bias and cathode caps only. The cans are also new but they're obviously not in this pic.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
--Jim

"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 14308
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by martin manning »

Looking good! Did you find a 32/16 can? I see F&T does make them as Roe says, but the only on-line outlet I found with a quick look was in the UK. How about the crackle and other noise?
User avatar
gui_tarzan
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:10 am
Location: The 26th State

Re: Amp porn - safe for work

Post by gui_tarzan »

I used an F&T 32/32, I couldn't find a US supplier for the 16/32 either. Honestly in that location it shouldn't change anything.

I haven't fired it up yet, there is a ground lead post missing in the power jack (they screw onto a terminal inside the socket) so I'm going to try to find one before I throw the juice at it.
--Jim

"He's like a new set of strings, he just needs to be stretched a bit."
Post Reply