Solidstate vs Tube Gain Staging

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
User avatar
Littlewyan
Posts: 1944
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:50 pm
Location: UK

Solidstate vs Tube Gain Staging

Post by Littlewyan »

I've started going down the rabbit hole of developing overdrive circuits for pedals, in particular pedals that emulate valve amps. Something I've noticed looking at other designs is they don't always match the same number of distorting stages as the amp but still do a good job emulating them. Why is this? Using logic you'd think you'd require the same number of stages. One example is the SLO Overdrive Pedal, this only has two distorting stages when the amp has 3 (4 if you split the last gain stage and cathode follower), but still sounds close.

Interested in others thoughts on this.
Stevem
Posts: 5144
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.

Re: Solidstate vs Tube Gain Staging

Post by Stevem »

Have you looked at how much gain / signal level gets dropped when passing thru a passive tone stack when even just adjusted to normal settings?
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!

Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
User avatar
LOUDthud
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:27 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Solidstate vs Tube Gain Staging

Post by LOUDthud »

Can you provide a schematic or link to the SLO pedal ?
User avatar
Littlewyan
Posts: 1944
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:50 pm
Location: UK

Re: Solidstate vs Tube Gain Staging

Post by Littlewyan »

Stevem wrote: Thu Oct 02, 2025 9:45 am Have you looked at how much gain / signal level gets dropped when passing thru a passive tone stack when even just adjusted to normal settings?
Yes but not really sure how this links in with how many stages are distorting. In an SLO the tonestack is at the end of the preamp, once all the distortion has been done. Unless you crank the master of course but it's not really an amp for that. And there's a big difference in how many stages distort a signal versus how much you distort a particular stage. The dynamics are very different.

https://www.pedalpcb.com/product/pcb596/
Stevem
Posts: 5144
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.

Re: Solidstate vs Tube Gain Staging

Post by Stevem »

A lot depends on what type of distortion sounds good to your ears.

As a tube clips harder and harder it produces odd and even order harmonics and each in vearing degrees .

These two types of harmonics can aid or detract in what you’re looking for sound wise.

To avoid types of distortion that sounds bad to most folks and how also certain types of distortion can reduce sustain ( the main reason we like distortion) you need to use only a certain level of distortion/ overdrive from each gain stage that you may need to get the type of harmonic overdrive you might like.
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!

Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
R.G.
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:01 pm

Re: Solidstate vs Tube Gain Staging

Post by R.G. »

It does make a kind of sense that similar sounds would need similar numbers of stages. The flaw in that line of thinking is that all stages are not equal, and even more so when the stages being compared are thermionic versus solid state.

Tube stages, especially triode stages as used in guitar amps, are very similar. When you pick the operating mode - common cathode, common plate, or common grid - you largely pick the range of gains that are possible, given that the 12AX7 is by far the most common tube used for signal stages. There is a tiny range of transconductance ("Mu") available, and all the tube stage gains involve mu as the major parameter. Mu is the ratio of plate current change divided by the change in grid voltage. Pretty much everything else falls out as a result of using resistors around the tube to use that amps/volt transconductance. The typical mu of a 12AX7 is in the range of 1ma per volt to 1.5ma per volt.

This is most certainly not the case for semiconductors. Semiconductors have much wider variation in their effective transconductance, and generally a much higher transconductance in general. To pick a gee-whiz number, a big MOSFET may have mu in the region of one amp per volt, a thousand times higher. Then there's that fact that a huge range of semiconductors are available - bipolars, JFET and MOSFETs are just the main classes, and there are hundreds or thousands of types inside these groupings.

In my mind, this makes the question of how many stages moot. All stages are dramatically not the same from tube to solid stage.

I believe a better question might be that of the output voltage size and waveform.
"It's not what we don't know that gets us in trouble. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
Mark Twain
Helmholtz
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2024 8:02 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Solidstate vs Tube Gain Staging

Post by Helmholtz »

R.G. wrote: Thu Oct 02, 2025 1:46 pm . There is a tiny range of transconductance ("Mu") available, and all the tube stage gains involve mu as the major parameter. Mu is the ratio of plate current change divided by the change in grid voltage. Pretty much everything else falls out as a result of using resistors around the tube to use that amps/volt transconductance. The typical mu of a 12AX7 is in the range of 1ma per volt to 1.5ma per volt.
You mean the transconductance gm. With tubes it's defined as gm = d(Ip)/dV(gk). Unit is A/V or Siemens (S).

(Mu or µ denotes the voltage amplification factor, defined as µ = d(Vp/d(Vgk) = rp * gm. Unit is V/V.
It corresponds to the max. possible voltage gain. Typical µ of a 12AX7 is 100.)
R.G.
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:01 pm

Re: Solidstate vs Tube Gain Staging

Post by R.G. »

yeah what you said... :D
"It's not what we don't know that gets us in trouble. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
Mark Twain
User avatar
LOUDthud
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:27 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Solidstate vs Tube Gain Staging

Post by LOUDthud »

Looking at the link the OP posted in reply #3, I see only opamps and diodes. Not a single transistor or FET. Is there no schematic available ?

Edit: AH, there is a schematic: https://docs.pedalpcb.com/project/LeadS ... dalPCB.pdf
R.G.
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:01 pm

Re: Solidstate vs Tube Gain Staging

Post by R.G. »

Ah.Thanks L.T.!

@OP: An opamp is typically three stages internally, a differential amplifier, a voltage gain stage and a high(er) current buffer output stage. This is all obscured by feedback into a composite stage until such a frequency that the internal gain reduces and lets the internal stages show through.

Feedback composite stages are another reason that all stages are not equal.
"It's not what we don't know that gets us in trouble. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
Mark Twain
Post Reply