POD MULE

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 10189
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: POD MULE

Post by Reeltarded »

Yep. A really good addition would be a simple 6 position rotary with 5 caps and a bypass for the bright.

NULL, 100p, 250p, 500p,1kp, 5kp, something like that? Also NFB lift and the simple resonance 4700p over a 1M. Very little work for lots of shaping. Like $15 worth of parts.

It will rock anyhow. If he has a situation where he can really drive the power, your buddy is gonna love you. I like a POD into tubes when the tubes are about to melt. Way more tones than a Herzog. heh
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
SilverFox
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:03 pm

Regarding the Plexi

Post by SilverFox »

I've recently wondered how feasible it is to bypass the first gain stage and run the signal into the 1 Meg drive pot through the first .022 capacitor. Why, to get the cathode follower compression and distortion...

Would that work? (schematic above)

silverfox.
User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 10189
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: POD MULE

Post by Reeltarded »

So just kill one stage? Drop the input right on the grid of the new first stage.

I think it's the wrong thing to do. The last thing I want there is more gain and something changing bandwidth, but yeah.. no need for that coupler, if I am understanding you.

The power I have used was a pair of 25w amps with no controls. The POD output was the master. Plugged into the returns and took the volume up until the tubes did that thing like a mirage where the glass exists only in a quantum state and you could heat a burrito in less than 60 seconds. Hammered.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
User avatar
RWood
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:56 pm

Re: POD MULE

Post by RWood »

M Fowler wrote:Without effects loop.
Thanks Mark. That's the 100w version of how I envisioned to the input into the power amp but was unsure about need for ground reference or grid stopper or coupling capacitor.
If it don't get hot and glow, I don't want it !
User avatar
roberto
Posts: 1841
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: Italy

Re: POD MULE

Post by roberto »

It depends if your friend want a full tube amp, or just to add some tube flavour to the output keeping the weight under control.

You can use a 12ax7 as a preamp (stage baxandall stage) going into a source follower then to a class D power amp. Few kilograms, and can easily fit into a 1RU together with the POD. Want to run it stereo? No problem.
pdf64
Posts: 2932
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Contact:

Re: POD MULE

Post by pdf64 »

All of these things generally sound better through a Marshall; give him a full pre amp / tone stack.
Add Reeltarded's rotary bright switch etc and he'll probably think it's better without the Pod.
https://www.justgiving.com/page/5-in-5-for-charlie This is my step son and his family. He is running 5 marathons in 5 days to support the research into STXBP1, the genetic condition my grandson Charlie has. Please consider supporting him!
cxx
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:17 am

Re: POD MULE

Post by cxx »

I think most, if not all of the PODs are stereo output. You should really consider a two channel power amp. The time based effects are pretty flat without the stereo and the sound won't measure up to the headphones or direct output.

Edit: I don't think there is any need to overdrive the power amp. It rounds off enough rough edges when running clean.
Post Reply