Respectfully, I disagree. Remember, we are a bunch of DIY people here. It it was my instrument, its doubtful I'd take it to someone and that's because I'm reasonably sure I can do that myself. What if you don't have the tools, knowledge, and skills to do that job? What if you do, but just don't feel like doing it? So, you take it to someone who has tools, knowledge, and experience. $70 is a bargain. The person who takes the work is going to stand behind what he does (at least he should) and it's going to take him some time to fish the wiring harness and get it all put together the way it should. And you think how much is appropriate? Remember, he's got overhead, too, because he's a business. If you don't want to pay a professional for his time, that's certainly OK. What's not OK is to expect someone to work for compensation that doesn't really pay the bills and produce an adequate profit. If he's not making a profit, he can't stay in business. If he can't stay in business, he won't be there the next time you need him.CherryFive wrote:You think it's seriously fair to charge 70 bucks to wire this simple thing? I've literally prepped the thing, built the new control panel, can supply plenty of awesome 70s CTS pots and jacks. 70 bucks is out of control for these simple two volume controls. I'd rather never play bass again than pay 70 for some guy to wire it
I'd tend to want to frame this in context of the instruments market value. I don't know if that's some POS $200 instrument, or if it's some rare $2,000 instrument. Certainly one might question putting $70 into a $200 instrument, but probably not into a $2,000 instrument. In the end you've got to decide, but to quibble over this price for the work doesn't seem appropriate to me.