After considering for a day or so, I'm not liking this calculation.tubeswell wrote:Po = Zo'*(Vg*gm)^2
Gm varies from one tube sample to the next and with operating condition, but more importantly it is defined at constant plate voltage which does not correspond with the way the device is being operated.
A much better estimate can be made by using the voltage and current swings from the idle point to Vg-k = 0 on the plate curves, and then calculating output power as (change in V)*(change in I)/2. For example, the Phillips EL-84 data sheet gives 17W for a pair in p-p operation at 300V Va into an 8k load. By this method I get 16.6W, as opposed to 13.8W using the data given at zero signal and the Zo'*(Vg*Gm)^2 method.
Re speaker rating vs. amp power, I think it's pretty common to use a speaker that is rated at twice the expected clean power output to allow for overdriven operation. As an example, I have a Marshall Studio 15 with it's original Vintage 30 speaker (23 years old and still rockin', and in fact the V30 was originally designed for this particular amp). It doesn't sound bad through a cab with 4x that rating, though. If I plug it into a pair of G12-65's, it sounds remarkably similar tone-wise to the V30, just "bigger."