Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

krash
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 12:43 am
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Contact:

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by krash »

Heh. I don't even know where it's going! Basically I was looking for a new tone character in my 18W Normal channel and this seems to be doing the trick for me, as in doing something new. However now I am in the process of converting "new" to "good". There are definitely some good things going on with the cascode but I'm not sure it's entirely mated to the rest of the 18W just right yet.

More testing to ensue :)

I'll be back in the studio tomorrow so I'll bring it along and record some with it. I always forget to check this stuff with my strat so I'll try and do that too. It's hard to crank it at home, and I don't think I can record here without a different mic pre because a fully-cranked 18W will cause the pre to clip.

FWIW I really love this cascode running clean with my Tele!
-josh
--
Revelation Guitar Amplifiers
http://www.revelationamps.com
dehughes
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by dehughes »

Noel Grassy wrote:This has been a fun raed. I like where it's apparently going. Dehughs,sir, what's the Latin in your signature translate as? Everytime I've read one of your posts I feel it says something about me.[guilt?] I never really studied up on some Latin befores. :oops: cheers
If memory serves, it is translated roughly as "Time, the devourer (or eater...) of all things." I believe it is from one of Ovid's works, but I can't remember exactly...

I like your Spinoza signature...I enjoyed reading his work, but haven't done so in a while.
Tempus edax rerum
krash
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 12:43 am
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Contact:

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by krash »

I think I settled on a 820 ohm cathode res. and 28K plate.

I reworked the tone control and need to work on it some more since it goes from "barely not bright" to "insanely bright" through the range right now. But the gain range is right. The amp freakin' screams!

BTW according to a calculator I downloaded, of course ignoring biasing of the cascode, I may have in the range of gain = 300+ in this circuit. That's pretty hot! It's definitely in a whole different league of crunch compared to a standard 18W.
-josh
--
Revelation Guitar Amplifiers
http://www.revelationamps.com
dehughes
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by dehughes »

krash wrote:I think I settled on a 820 ohm cathode res. and 28K plate.

I reworked the tone control and need to work on it some more since it goes from "barely not bright" to "insanely bright" through the range right now. But the gain range is right. The amp freakin' screams!

BTW according to a calculator I downloaded, of course ignoring biasing of the cascode, I may have in the range of gain = 300+ in this circuit. That's pretty hot! It's definitely in a whole different league of crunch compared to a standard 18W.

Cool...


david
Tempus edax rerum
raiken
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:10 pm
Location: Greenwood, SC
Contact:

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by raiken »

You left out the cathode bias resistor for the top tube in your schematic. Self-biased cascode requires it to properly bias the upper tube. Use the same value as you have for the lower tube. You can bypass it with a cap if you like for a bit more gain, but it isn't necessary.

Randall Aiken
krash
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 12:43 am
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Contact:

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by krash »

Thanks Randall. That's probably why this bad boy has so much over the top gain :)

I need to get in there and do a tone control mod too so I'll fix that up and see how she sounds.
-josh
--
Revelation Guitar Amplifiers
http://www.revelationamps.com
User avatar
mhuss
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:09 am
Location: SE PA, USA
Contact:

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by mhuss »

raiken wrote:
mhuss wrote: That said, the discontinued Aiken Tomcat uses a single 12AT7 as a preamp tube, so it seems extremely likely that that's the cascode one!
No, I don't use a cascode in any of my production amps.
Oops -- I misconstrued your "...your hunch is correct" comment! :?

--mark h
User avatar
David Root
Posts: 3540
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Location: Chilliwack BC

Self Biased Cascode

Post by David Root »

I have been considering using the self-biased SRPP (Totem Pole, Cathode based Cascode) shown in the Glassware Tubecad software. Each triode has an identical Rk. B+ goes straight on the upper triode and Ra is on the lower triode, right below the upper Rk. The output comes off the cathode of the upper triode. With a 12AT7 at 400V B+, Ra 11K, Rk 1k2, current 2 mA, gain is 57, Vo max is a huge +/- 141V, and Z out is 586 ohms.

Given Mr. Aiken's preference for the 12AT7, how does this look as either a first stage or final peamp stage?
krash
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 12:43 am
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Contact:

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by krash »

BTW, for a sample recording (in the mix, sorry) of my efforts at the 6DJ8 in the 18W, here's the tune (rough mix):

http://krashjones.com/media/preview/03.mp3

The trem guitar track is the trem channel of the 18W. The rhythm-crunch guitar that comes in on the chorus is the stratocaster into the 6DJ8 cascode channel. That's with the vol on about 5 IIRC.

It's a big, fat, gritty, aggressive kind of tone. Not smooth. More like "mean". I like it a lot, especially since it's a whole different flavor from any of my other amps.
-josh
--
Revelation Guitar Amplifiers
http://www.revelationamps.com
PPL
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:00 am

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by PPL »

This is my 1st post on the Amp garage, so why not dig up an old topic simply because I presently am doing similar things however using local feedback loops along with a nice twist on the Ultra-linear cascode topology.

the measured voltages are from a working design using several fresh samples of each listed tube type and the Avg. published.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Andy Le Blanc
Posts: 2582
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:16 am
Location: central Maine

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by Andy Le Blanc »

They're good with bass, where you need the bandwidth but you don't want to over drive one.
lazymaryamps
andrew
Posts: 587
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: alabama

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by andrew »

Hi, If I wanted to use the Valve Wizard self biased cascode 12au7 in a Rocket would I still use the 500pf / 500k pot coming off the anode? Thanks for any advice.
User avatar
Merlinb
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Burnley, Lancashire
Contact:

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by Merlinb »

andrew wrote:Hi, If I wanted to use the Valve Wizard self biased cascode 12au7 in a Rocket would I still use the 500pf / 500k pot coming off the anode? Thanks for any advice.
Yes- that's you're coupling cap and volume control- you need them!
andrew
Posts: 587
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: alabama

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by andrew »

Thanks Merlin.
krash
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 12:43 am
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Contact:

Re: Randall Aiken, cascode vs. pentode, ??

Post by krash »

FWIW, I am a huge fan of this cascode 6DJ8 design, and I am putting it in many of my production amps. I have been meaning to try it with a 12AU7. I think this is an unfortunate neglected gain stage design that has a lot to offer.
-josh
--
Revelation Guitar Amplifiers
http://www.revelationamps.com
Post Reply