Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
I'm in the process of building a Fender style standalone reverb for a friend and it got me thinking. Why don't we use an octal tube like a 6K6 or 6V6 for internal reverb drivers? I'm not tube savy enough to do all the calculations, but I'd think that it would be far warmer then the 12AT7 driver.
My thought is to simply replace the parallel 12AT7 with a 6V6 driver. Before I do something that requires punching out a larger hole, I thought I'd run it by the good folks here in case I'm missing something.
Thoughts?
My thought is to simply replace the parallel 12AT7 with a 6V6 driver. Before I do something that requires punching out a larger hole, I thought I'd run it by the good folks here in case I'm missing something.
Thoughts?
Last edited by Bob-I on Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Reverb, why not use a 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
If I'm not mistaken, some current model Fender amps (the point to point ones) have this type of reverb. Essentially the stand alone reverb circuit built into the front of the amp. Not sure if they use a 6K6 or maybe 6V6.
Bob-I wrote:I'm in the process of building a Fender style standalone reverb for a friend and it got me thinking. Why don't we use an octal tube like a 6K6 or 6V6 for internal reverb drivers? I'm not tube savy enough to do all the calculations, but I'd think that it would be far warmer then the 12AT7 driver.
My thought is to simply replace the parallel 12AT7 with a 6V6 driver. Before I do something that requires punching out a larger hole, I thought I'd run it by the good folks here in case I'm missing something.
Thoughts?
- Darkbluemurder
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:28 pm
Re: Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
If I remember correctly the Tone King Meteor II uses a 6V6 for the reverb.
- Luthierwnc
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: Asheville, NC
Re: Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
I made one a couple months ago. It works really well in the passive loop. It isn't as good in front of an amp. When I get to it, I'll mod in a switch to convert it to a 6G15. It is pretty close to that now except for taking the signal off the plate instead of the cathode.
I think I took a picture of the guts. When I get home I'll dig it out and post it.
Skip
I think I took a picture of the guts. When I get home I'll dig it out and post it.
Skip
- FUCHSAUDIO
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:48 pm
- Location: New Jersey (you got a problem with that ?)
- Contact:
another suggestion
Traynor used the EL-84, which when hooked up as a triode works really well. Same socket size too.
They used it in both transformer and cap coupled (Ampeg) styles too.
Proud holder of US Patent # 7336165.
- Funkalicousgroove
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:04 pm
- Location: Denver, CO
- Contact:
Re: Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
I just did a cap job/restoration/maintenance on a traynor YGL3A MKIII with the EL84 Reverb driver, man what a sweet chimey sounding amp! I just don't get it, I mean the Traynors had great components, MUSTARD CAPS, Mullard tubes (In alot of cases) and go for less than MV silverface fenders on the used market. some of them had goofy circuits, but this one was a Twin reverb(almost exactly!) with EL34's and nicer reverb.
Owner/Solder Jockey Bludotone Amp Works
- Luthierwnc
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: Asheville, NC
Re: Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
Update: Here's a picture of the guts
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Luthierwnc
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: Asheville, NC
Re: Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
And the front. I used a 3 spring, medium decay tank. sh
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
I just looked up the schematic, very cool amp, and exactly what I was getting at with the reverb driver. Since the EL-84 uses a 9 pin I think I'll give this one a try.Funkalicousgroove wrote:I just did a cap job/restoration/maintenance on a traynor YGL3A MKIII with the EL84 Reverb driver, man what a sweet chimey sounding amp! I just don't get it, I mean the Traynors had great components, MUSTARD CAPS, Mullard tubes (In alot of cases) and go for less than MV silverface fenders on the used market. some of them had goofy circuits, but this one was a Twin reverb(almost exactly!) with EL34's and nicer reverb.
Re: Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
Yes, yes... That was the amp I gigged with through much of the '70s. Sweet, indeed - maybe a lil' heavy in an Anvil roadcase but my back was much younger then.Funkalicousgroove wrote:I just did a cap job/restoration/maintenance on a traynor YGL3A MKIII with the EL84 Reverb driver, man what a sweet chimey sounding amp!
- Funkalicousgroove
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:04 pm
- Location: Denver, CO
- Contact:
Re: Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
Yeah, it was a BEAR to move around, but those trannies are DEFINITELY over engineered. If I needed a giggable amp for a couple hundred bucks this would be high on my list for sure!
Owner/Solder Jockey Bludotone Amp Works
- Luthierwnc
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: Asheville, NC
Re: Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
If you are thinking about getting off the Fender reservation, I would have a hard look at the Ampeg set-up. I have always loved the verbs in the Ampegs, especially the Gemini's and Reverbrockets. It seems it is part of the sound rather than added to it. I did a ground-up restoration on a Gemini I last year and the reverb is great.
You can still get the higher impedance tanks and 6CG7 tubes pretty easily. IMHO, this is a better reverb for the "D" amps than the twangier transformer-driven tank. Plus, you save a little real estate not needing a fifth trannie.
Skip
You can still get the higher impedance tanks and 6CG7 tubes pretty easily. IMHO, this is a better reverb for the "D" amps than the twangier transformer-driven tank. Plus, you save a little real estate not needing a fifth trannie.
Skip
Re: Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
I had a Traynor MKIII with the EL84 reverb and I've played the Fender Zinky amps with both the EL84 and 6V6 reverb drivers. I prefer the Octal tube driven circuits; I think they have a smoother tone to them. The El84 sounds harsh to me.
I built a Revibe with a 6K6 which I use in the Dumbleator Loop. The 6K6 seems to have the sweetest reverb tone but it does need lower B+; the 6v6 is a good 2nd choice...
TT
I built a Revibe with a 6K6 which I use in the Dumbleator Loop. The 6K6 seems to have the sweetest reverb tone but it does need lower B+; the 6v6 is a good 2nd choice...
TT
- FUCHSAUDIO
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:48 pm
- Location: New Jersey (you got a problem with that ?)
- Contact:
Hey big mouth....
With guys like you broadcasting it on the web, that will change in about a week...lol. They are truly sleepers. Some of the first ODS mods were done on YBA-1's and Bassmans. The Traynors always shined, and the 2 X EL-34 ODS mods screamed seriously good. Lots of clean headroom too. The ones with 2 x 6550's running like 580 volts are downright righteous.Funkalicousgroove wrote:I just did a cap job/restoration/maintenance on a traynor YGL3A MKIII with the EL84 Reverb driver, man what a sweet chimey sounding amp! I just don't get it, I mean the Traynors had great components, MUSTARD CAPS, Mullard tubes (In alot of cases) and go for less than MV silverface fenders on the used market. some of them had goofy circuits, but this one was a Twin reverb(almost exactly!) with EL34's and nicer reverb.
Proud holder of US Patent # 7336165.
- Luthierwnc
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: Asheville, NC
Re: Schematic..... 6K6 like the standalone reverb?
+1
My first casualty was a YBA-1 that became a McIntyre Bluesmaker. I got it in trade for a fret job. The real sleeper in the group is the Voice Master. It is a four channel, 50watt, tube driven mixer/PA. It has the same power amp as the other two-tube Traynors and it has eight pots on the front panel which makes it a very good candidate for a "D". Acres of room on the inside too.
FWIW, Skip
My first casualty was a YBA-1 that became a McIntyre Bluesmaker. I got it in trade for a fret job. The real sleeper in the group is the Voice Master. It is a four channel, 50watt, tube driven mixer/PA. It has the same power amp as the other two-tube Traynors and it has eight pots on the front panel which makes it a very good candidate for a "D". Acres of room on the inside too.
FWIW, Skip
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.