How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

frischmann
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:03 pm

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by frischmann »

Yeah,
I was really looking forward to this working.
I didn't do the head phone thing but I did route the OT wires correctly with some slack and played with the location a bit, It didn't make any difference.

It may be that the D'lite chassis just isn't big enough to accomodate a choke and a Bassman OT.

Or,
It could be something else. I had to really get my hands in there to get this done, I had to dig under the relay boards and a bunc of other un-fun stuff.

I may have bumped a ground, It sounds good it's just the noise floor is too high. With the PAB, it's way too high.

I'll see if I can post some pics.
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by Structo »

I'm thinking it has to be fixable because I have read about quite a few guys putting bigger iron in there D'Lites.

Your problem kind of scares me though....

I plan on possibly putting mine in tomorrow.

I bought the Prosonic OT from Angela.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
frischmann
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:03 pm

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by frischmann »

[IMG:640:480]http://img376.imageshack.us/img376/8792 ... 008oq5.jpg[/img]
By pfrischmann, shot with DSC-W70 at 2008-12-05

[IMG:640:480]http://img376.imageshack.us/img376/3130 ... 009xh1.jpg[/img]
By pfrischmann, shot with DSC-W70 at 2008-12-05

[IMG:640:480]http://img376.imageshack.us/img376/5175 ... 001sg4.jpg[/img]
By pfrischmann, shot with DSC-W70 at 2008-12-05
frischmann
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:03 pm

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by frischmann »

What do you guys think?
User avatar
bnwitt
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:51 pm

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by bnwitt »

Wow, obviously the postion of a transformer is really important. This thread has gone to 3 pages! :lol:
Great things happen in a vacuum
User avatar
KT66
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:52 am
Location: Puyallup WA

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by KT66 »

I always use the headphone trick on my builds too, but I don't use headphones anymore, I just use my scope. I thought this article about reducing induced hum from the PT was interesting : http://home.comcast.net/~machrone/bjr/bjrhum.htm
Ryan

Music is the best. F.Z.

http://Classictubeamps.com
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by Structo »

Heheheh, looks like a tin foil hat for the output transformer.

Frischmann,
I don't have a choke on mine so I hope I can keep my OT in about the same spot.
If I have to drill new mounting holes that is going to be bad because of the drill tailings but in the past I made a masking tape thing to catch them.

One thing I notice about your amp in the last picture.

When I first got my amp going I had the standby switch wire routed too close to the AC wires and it induced some 60Hz hum into the amp.

Once I separated that wire that goes from the switch to the board the hum went down noticeably.
I ran it between the power board and PT.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
frischmann
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:03 pm

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by frischmann »

Cool tip Structo,
Thanks.

I guess I'll check my grounds and fix that and some leads dress I messed up getting the OT in place...Next. I put back the old OT....

Then get rid of the choke.....

If either of those fix it, I may have to see if I can squeeze the choke and OT in really close together.

This time I won't mount anything until I hear it under full gain with the PAB on.

Is there any reason a coudn't put the choke after the OT....so it goes

PT, OT....choke?

That would make life much easier....

Last, I start running wires outside...
User avatar
bnwitt
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:51 pm

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by bnwitt »

Structo wrote:Heheheh, looks like a tin foil hat for the output transformer.


Yep. Nice to know someone gets my warped sense of humour.
Great things happen in a vacuum
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by Structo »

frischmann wrote:Cool tip Structo,
Thanks.

I guess I'll check my grounds and fix that and some leads dress I messed up getting the OT in place...Next. I put back the old OT....

Then get rid of the choke.....

If either of those fix it, I may have to see if I can squeeze the choke and OT in really close together.

This time I won't mount anything until I hear it under full gain with the PAB on.

Is there any reason a coudn't put the choke after the OT....so it goes

PT, OT....choke?

That would make life much easier....

Last, I start running wires outside...
I am far from a design EE but I would think as long as the choke is in the right place electrically it would be ok.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
frischmann
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:03 pm

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by frischmann »

Hey Structo,
How'd it go?
tubetek
Posts: 150
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:04 pm
Location: RedRiverGorge, KY.

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by tubetek »

"Is there any reason a coudn't put the choke after the OT....so it goes

PT, OT....choke?"

Marshall did it alot (see JTM45 and PLEXI series) I do it sometimes, but still use the headphone test on scratch builds.
Tom
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by Structo »

I haven't made the swap yet....

Family, other things are keeping me busy but I hope to do it in the coming week.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
User avatar
novosibir
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
Contact:

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by novosibir »

Fischerman wrote:FWIW the Soldano SLO has the OT over at the preamp end and it's a high gain amp.
Not only Soldano does it this way:

[img:800:533]http://www.larry-amplification.de/dino9 ... 061-01.jpg[/img]

[img:1024:604]http://www.larry-amplification.de/briti ... 4735.1.jpg[/img]

My chassis are made of stainless steel, what's not shielding magnetic fields (but also doesn't lead magnetic fields), so with a chassis of aluminum it also shouldn't be a problem!

But you have to put a shield inside the chassis right above the grommets, where the primaries & secondaries enter the chassis and below the board, so that these cables are running like in a sandwich, until they've reached the rear edge of the chassis - as seen on the attached photo.

Larry
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery
frischmann
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:03 pm

Re: How Important is the physical OT Placement, hum question

Post by frischmann »

Wow,
Larry. Those look amazing.
Post Reply