it is celest g12-100..yes you are right about low notes, (bass knob at 4/10, treble and mids are on 2/10) i had it too much besides this setting (i'm searching best ways to tame it) .. in power supply i have 47 uF to anodes so i think that this will do and clean works well.. 0.1 uF couplers to output PCL tubes are next suspiciousmat wrote:Sounding good. Is this with the Mesas speaker ? I think I can hear the speaker or the power section adding a bit too much lower mid section frequencies to my taste to not make the sound clear or balanced. What is Your settings of the potentiometers on the amp/guitar?bepone wrote:one more (for the record)
ECC83->EF80->PCL's86 , Gibson LP, Celestion 1x G12-100, zoom h2
http://www.soundclick.com/player/single ... i&newref=1
miniHRM evolution
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Re: miniHRM evolution
Re: miniHRM evolution
http://www.classictone.net/40-18031.html Would this magnetic components ot be suitable for a 86 special ? Thanks, Jeff
Re: miniHRM evolution
Hi JBP,JBP wrote:http://www.classictone.net/40-18031.html Would this magnetic components ot be suitable for a 86 special ? Thanks, Jeff
I hope the more experienced members will answer Your question about the transformer.
Pic of the (not AT ALL finished) chassis: http://mattitee.kuvat.fi/kuvat/MTs%20mi ... 5.jpg/full
I had a few minutes to record another clip of the amp. I tried the Kleinulator (the early fet version) on the loop but it thinned the sound on both serial and parallel mode. Oddly enough the Boss delay sounded best without the Kleinulator.
Here is again (very nervous
http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=10479582
New mix: http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=10542746
Cheers,
Last edited by mat on Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mat
Re: miniHRM evolution
What a big sound out of such a little tube.. Sounds killer - as does the playing!mat wrote: Here is again (very nervous) clip of the amp.
http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=10479582
Cheers,
Re: miniHRM evolution
Awesome" as usual...
Have you been riding that Metro train again?
I lived in Kulosaari and Puotila so I understand hehe

Have you been riding that Metro train again?
I lived in Kulosaari and Puotila so I understand hehe
Re: miniHRM evolution
Thanks stelligan, rogb.rogb wrote:Awesome" as usual...![]()
Have you been riding that Metro train again?
I lived in Kulosaari and Puotila so I understand hehe
Yes, i use that metro every day to get to work
mat
Re: miniHRM evolution
Mat,
That's waaayy over the top incredible guitar playing to my ears! Just amazing technique.
IF I heard a guitarist having that MP3 on a CD, I'd be looking to collect everything they've recorded. Sort of like I've done with Carlton and Fourplay's stuff.
It sounded like the amp was starting to either oscillate or feedback in places? Do you know which it was doing? Oscillation is somewhat problematic, but feedback can be musical and somewhat useful, IMO.
And I am wondering if you had held a note (for some length like 5 seconds or more) if would've made either that oscillation or feedback?
Does your band typically play that type of great grooves which sounds kind of like a blend of rock, funk and jazz to my ears. Whatever it is, I love it!
With respect, 10thtx
That's waaayy over the top incredible guitar playing to my ears! Just amazing technique.
IF I heard a guitarist having that MP3 on a CD, I'd be looking to collect everything they've recorded. Sort of like I've done with Carlton and Fourplay's stuff.
It sounded like the amp was starting to either oscillate or feedback in places? Do you know which it was doing? Oscillation is somewhat problematic, but feedback can be musical and somewhat useful, IMO.
And I am wondering if you had held a note (for some length like 5 seconds or more) if would've made either that oscillation or feedback?
Does your band typically play that type of great grooves which sounds kind of like a blend of rock, funk and jazz to my ears. Whatever it is, I love it!
With respect, 10thtx
Re: miniHRM evolution
Jeff thanks for the very nice comments. I had the drive almost full and was sitting too close on the amp. On the oscillation point on the recording I turned the guitar volume at full. The layout is also not ready and that is propably one reason for it.
Our band plays more country and southern rock style. These soundclips of the amps I've built are just quick ideas from my head. And they sound like that also... ;O)
Our band plays more country and southern rock style. These soundclips of the amps I've built are just quick ideas from my head. And they sound like that also... ;O)
mat
Re: miniHRM evolution
Wow! You can play country too. I'm a big fan of Chet Atkins and Vince Gill. Last time I visited Nashville, I heard some incredible players.Our band plays more country and southern rock style
Yeah, I guess sitting super close to the amp would cause some feedback.
The amp sounds excellent and you're playing sounds even better.
With respect, 10thtx
-
azatplayer
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:59 pm
- Location: Great Southland
Re: miniHRM evolution
Mat have you given thought to modding the tonestack further given you are running controls down on the treble, and not using the bright switch?
Then the guy thats tried the circuit using different tubes appears to be having the same result.
Maybe lowering the slope resistor, perhaps increasing the first cathode byoass from 5uf to 25uf and dropping the second stage bypass altogether?
Just a thought, will find out for myself soon enough as my trannies have arrived
Then the guy thats tried the circuit using different tubes appears to be having the same result.
Maybe lowering the slope resistor, perhaps increasing the first cathode byoass from 5uf to 25uf and dropping the second stage bypass altogether?
Just a thought, will find out for myself soon enough as my trannies have arrived
Re: miniHRM evolution
I'm afraid loosing the definition of the OD with 25uF on the V1. Haven't tried it so far. All my energy is on the new build. Definitely will get back to the original build with new layout/turret board.azatplayer wrote:Mat have you given thought to modding the tonestack further given you are running controls down on the treble, and not using the bright switch?
Then the guy thats tried the circuit using different tubes appears to be having the same result.
Maybe lowering the slope resistor, perhaps increasing the first cathode byoass from 5uf to 25uf and dropping the second stage bypass altogether?
Just a thought, will find out for myself soon enough as my trannies have arrived
mat
-
azatplayer
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:59 pm
- Location: Great Southland
Re: miniHRM evolution
Yes it is true that definition is pretty sweet. Will se how i go, cheers dude.
-
azatplayer
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:59 pm
- Location: Great Southland
Re: miniHRM evolution
heya Jeff, on the layout, you have the 250K OD drive pot feeding the EF86 from the wiper. On the schematic you have the EF86 grid connected to the right side lug. Cheers buddy, Don
Re: miniHRM evolution
I'm just wiring that section up at the moment, I can't see what you mean, but I am not using the OD tone pot as I have an HRM board in this.azatplayer wrote:heya Jeff, on the layout, you have the 250K OD drive pot feeding the EF86 from the wiper. On the schematic you have the EF86 grid connected to the right side lug. Cheers buddy, Don
I would be grateful if you could post a layout/ schemo showing this, if only to save my butt here
EDIT: ah, I think I see what you mean - OD1 and OD2 on the layout.
Well I think for now I will go for the layout, as it seems the same as the original mini HRM with the 5879
Re: miniHRM evolution
I have corrected the editable ExpressSCH layout here:
http://www.el34world.com/Forum/index.php?topic=9149.0
With respect, 10thtx
http://www.el34world.com/Forum/index.php?topic=9149.0
With respect, 10thtx