Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
erwin_ve
Posts: 1792
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by erwin_ve »

Hi guys, This week I had a Ceriatone on my bench that needed some attention. It's a high plate skyliner and the owner does want to use it without a dlator.

Some things I changed:
The mid cap is a 0.01uF 715P.(was 6PS)
The treble a: 0.002 6PS into 390pF silver mica.(was 330pF ceramic)
Od v2b resistor after couple cap a 150k.(was 180k)
snubbers stayed at: 330pF
The LNFB at v1b is 4x10M instead of 2x22M.
Dropping string: 2,7K-22K-2,2K(was 3,9k-22k-2,2k)
No master bright cap.
presence cap 1uF tantalum(instead of 1uF electrolytic).

http://soundcloud.com/erwin_ve/modded-ceriatone-ots
Was recorded at low volume with a g12-65 cab with a sm57 mic.
Reverb added afterwards, no eq, no compression.
Plz let me know your thoughts.
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by Structo »

That sounds real good!

You did a great job on tweaking the amp. :D
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by Bob-I »

Sounds great, you really nailed the tone.
pinner
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:27 am

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by pinner »

Sounds great!!!!!
Zippy
Posts: 2052
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:18 pm

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by Zippy »

erwin_ve wrote:Some things I changed:

The LNFB at v1b is 4x10M instead of 2x22M.
40M vs 44M???

Or are you summing off-spec resistors to get a desired value?

What am I not getting?

Have you performed such substitutions to know which have the more profound effect or is this a particular recipe that you favor? I could see value in the mods to the dropping and tone stack. The rest seems much more subtle.

Thanks.
User avatar
erwin_ve
Posts: 1792
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by erwin_ve »

Zippy wrote:
erwin_ve wrote:Some things I changed:

The LNFB at v1b is 4x10M instead of 2x22M.
40M vs 44M???

Or are you summing off-spec resistors to get a desired value?

What am I not getting?

Have you performed such substitutions to know which have the more profound effect or is this a particular recipe that you favor? I could see value in the mods to the dropping and tone stack. The rest seems much more subtle.

Thanks.
Everything counts; I'm just sharing.
The parts that are substituted are done with a reason. Try them for yourself.
Some are subtle, some are very noticeable.
User avatar
da Geezer
Posts: 253
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 12:31 pm
Location: VA, USA

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by da Geezer »

Sounds great Erwin!

Are the PT/OT stock Ceriatone, or something else?

TIA, Geezer
User avatar
stelligan
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Nashvull

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by stelligan »

Very nice sounding playing & tone. I'll have to send my next build to the Netherlands for tweaking....... 8)
User avatar
bigmik
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: bahamas

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by bigmik »

really nice clip erwin love the chirp.

what difference do you notice with the prescence cap being tantalum vs
electrolytic

thanks
neil
Zippy
Posts: 2052
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:18 pm

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by Zippy »

erwin_ve wrote:Everything counts; I'm just sharing.
The parts that are substituted are done with a reason. Try them for yourself.
Some are subtle, some are very noticeable.
Thanks, Erwin. I'll be writing (yes, I still use a pen!) those in my note book.

Cheers!
User avatar
erwin_ve
Posts: 1792
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by erwin_ve »

Thnx guys for listening!

Geezer: yes stock OT and PT. The run after summer 2008 is better sounding. Don't know why...
bigmik: tantalum is more efficient in high freq.to my ears. When dialing in half way; it's more open compared to a electrolytic. I'll have to dial in a electrolytic at least to 3/4 open on the presence to get the same results.
Or maybe I'm just using the wrong alu electrolytics; who knows... :P
vibratoking
Posts: 2640
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by vibratoking »

Great sound and playing. And thank you for the information.

I tried a tant and I found that the highs are sweeter at lower volumes. I had limited time, I was on lunch, so I'll have to listen some more before my final opinion. Only a few minutes before changing the to a tant, I added a 150k FET load resistor, I don't have the full FET circuit yet. So I am a little unsure if the change I heard was due to the FET resistor or the tant or both. I don't want to derail, but what are your B voltages? I found that after adding the FET resistor, my B5, B4, and B3 voltages are all about 15 volts low. So about 182 on V1a.
Zippy
Posts: 2052
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:18 pm

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by Zippy »

vibratoking wrote:I found that after adding the FET resistor, my B5, B4, and B3 voltages are all about 15 volts low. So about 182 on V1a.
Isn't the whole point of the FET load resistor to get the voltages right? Maybe you didn't need it in your build.
vibratoking
Posts: 2640
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by vibratoking »

Yes, but I will be adding the FET circuit and then I won't have a choice.
User avatar
ElectronAvalanche
Posts: 376
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 9:17 pm

Re: Modded Ceriatone OTS soundclip

Post by ElectronAvalanche »

Great tweaking!

The amp really shines!

Concerning the Tant vs Lytic presence cap:

Did you measure the capacity of both caps? With the tolerances of electrolytics I guess a difference in the amount of presence could maybe be due to the value. The tants do have tighter tolerances?

Again great sounding amp!

Cheers,

Electron
Post Reply