HRM odd Layout - advice needed
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
HRM odd Layout - advice needed
Hi, everyone.
I'm rebuilding my HRM originally built by a local tech. The PT is gone and
the builder kindly offered to replace it (it's been more than a year, his
stated warranty). I decided to rebuild it from scratch, try to make it
cleaner and simpler, and hopefully more 'dumbly' in sound. I'm taking
off tube rectification, triode/pentode switch, putting the post-OD TS back
inside the amp, and taking off a bunch of the preamp switch.
I was hoping y'all could take a look at my layout (thanks Normster
for the Visio and inspiration and Bob-I for your layouts too). It's my
second amp build and I'm very newbie so any help is much appreciated.
Please note that this amp has an odd layout and I was hoping not to
machine the chassis much (at all if possible, except for drilling the
occasional hole). Lots of parts are left unused and if I decide to do a
faceplate they'll go away.
Points to note:
1- Cathode resistors mounted on the board. Is that a problem?
2- Why not ground the OD channel?
3- PAB and channel switching may be wrong. Please take a look.
4- I've prepared to use the 5v secondary to power the relays, but I'm
gonna build without them first.
Thanks everyone. Circuit is HiGain's as I haven't had the time to go
through my notes (basically, advice collected here and from dogears)
All the best
I'm rebuilding my HRM originally built by a local tech. The PT is gone and
the builder kindly offered to replace it (it's been more than a year, his
stated warranty). I decided to rebuild it from scratch, try to make it
cleaner and simpler, and hopefully more 'dumbly' in sound. I'm taking
off tube rectification, triode/pentode switch, putting the post-OD TS back
inside the amp, and taking off a bunch of the preamp switch.
I was hoping y'all could take a look at my layout (thanks Normster
for the Visio and inspiration and Bob-I for your layouts too). It's my
second amp build and I'm very newbie so any help is much appreciated.
Please note that this amp has an odd layout and I was hoping not to
machine the chassis much (at all if possible, except for drilling the
occasional hole). Lots of parts are left unused and if I decide to do a
faceplate they'll go away.
Points to note:
1- Cathode resistors mounted on the board. Is that a problem?
2- Why not ground the OD channel?
3- PAB and channel switching may be wrong. Please take a look.
4- I've prepared to use the 5v secondary to power the relays, but I'm
gonna build without them first.
Thanks everyone. Circuit is HiGain's as I haven't had the time to go
through my notes (basically, advice collected here and from dogears)
All the best
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by fabiomayo on Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
No, these are commonly mounted on the board. Your layout doesn't show them on the board though, which is also fine if it helps with the lead dress, but I always mount the cathode resistors and caps on the board.fabiomayo wrote:Please note that this amp has an odd layout and I was hoping not to
machine the chassis much (at all if possible, except for drilling the
occasional hole). Lots of parts are left unused and if I decide to do a
faceplate they'll go away.
Points to note:
1- Cathode resistors mounted on the board. Is that a problem?
This confuses me. What do you mean?2- Why not ground the OD channel?
No that looks correct to me.3- PAB and channel switching may be wrong. Please take a look.
Yes, I've done that before too.4- I've prepared to use the 5v secondary to power the relays, but I'm gonna build without them first.
Looks like a workable layout.
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
Sorry... I meant grid resistorsBob-I wrote:No, these are commonly mounted on the board. Your layout doesn't show them on the board though, which is also fine if it helps with the lead dress, but I always mount the cathode resistors and caps on the board.fabiomayo wrote:1- Cathode resistors mounted on the board. Is that a problem?
and V2a 68k. The others are mounted directed on the sockets as some
layouts here.
I read somewhere on this forum that you shouldn't ground the OD whenBob-I wrote:This confuses me. What do you mean?2- Why not ground the OD channel?
in clean mode, but most schematics do. Should I lift the OD section and
ground it or not? If so, where? Together with the preamp ground bus?
Thanks, Bob-I. Your help is much appreciated. I got your 5v supply
schematic and since I gave up the tube rectifier it was pretty obvious
what to do...
How's the lead dress? Thanks to my poor understanding I'm always
worried about wires crossing each other or running too close parallel
to each other...
I have a couple more questions though...
1- Originally this amp had the 3-way ground switch with a .047uF (or
.47uF - I don't recall
Is it for plugging into two conductor outlets? These are the most
common around here...
2- Should I keep a B+ fuse?
3- I was thinking of using a resistor instead of the choke. Is it useful
to have it switchable?
Thank you SO MUCH!
All the best.
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
Ohhh... One more
How about the cathode resistors and bypass caps mounted on the tube
sockets and grounded on a separate ground bus? That's how the amp
came but I can change it if there's any potential for problems...
How about the cathode resistors and bypass caps mounted on the tube
sockets and grounded on a separate ground bus? That's how the amp
came but I can change it if there's any potential for problems...
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
Is the presence pot wired correct?
On the schem, there is a cap between the side-lug and ground, and the resistor connects to ground, without touching that lug.
On your layout, both the cap and resistor meet at that lug, before it's grounded.
When the wiper on the schematic is on top, the pot is bypassed, so the signal is divided between the 390R and the cap. That's how it is in your design too.
But when the wiper on the schematic is at the bottom, The signal goes through the whole pot, and then through the cap, while on your design, the cap is bypassed in that position...
Or am I wrong?
On the schem, there is a cap between the side-lug and ground, and the resistor connects to ground, without touching that lug.
On your layout, both the cap and resistor meet at that lug, before it's grounded.
When the wiper on the schematic is on top, the pot is bypassed, so the signal is divided between the 390R and the cap. That's how it is in your design too.
But when the wiper on the schematic is at the bottom, The signal goes through the whole pot, and then through the cap, while on your design, the cap is bypassed in that position...
Or am I wrong?
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
Runnin' the gain up a bit with an 8k feedback resistor! That may be way too high. I'd go back to the 4.7k
Also, a 50 watt amp might perform better with 50uf total filtration. In addition, you can remove the 470k that is bypassing the single filters. You only use them to equalize the series pairs.
Good luck!
Also, a 50 watt amp might perform better with 50uf total filtration. In addition, you can remove the 470k that is bypassing the single filters. You only use them to equalize the series pairs.
Good luck!
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
Ok. Thanks.dogears wrote:Runnin' the gain up a bit with an 8k feedback resistor! That may be way too high. I'd go back to the 4.7k
On B+1, is that it? Ok.dogears wrote:Also, a 50 watt amp might perform better with 50uf total filtration.
Thanks. I had no idea of what was the purpose of these resistors.dogears wrote:In addition, you can remove the 470k that is bypassing the single filters. You only use them to equalize the series pairs.
Thanks for catching that. I don't even know why I did it that wayTdale wrote:Is the presence pot wired correct?
Fixed the file.
Thanks so much, guys. Really apreciated.
All the best.
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
What program do you use to make the layout? It's beautiful!
Tommy
Tommy
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
It is Normster work, not mine. I just rearranged the parts to my schemTdale wrote:What program do you use to make the layout? It's beautiful!
Tommy
and layout. Program is MS Visio.
Attached is the visio file for anyone interested.
All the best and thanks for the advice.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
Okay, people. I went all the way and drawn the relays according to Bob-I's
schematic (the one with the 'virtual' ground). Please, take a look at the lead
dress and relay function. I added three relays: PAB, MidBoost and Drive.
As far as I can tell, with the front panel switches off, the footswitches should
work fine. On the footswitch, I'll have three switches: Drive+PAB, PAB alone
and MidBoost. Only way to access Drive without PAB would be through the
front panel.
Thank you all.
All the best.
schematic (the one with the 'virtual' ground). Please, take a look at the lead
dress and relay function. I added three relays: PAB, MidBoost and Drive.
As far as I can tell, with the front panel switches off, the footswitches should
work fine. On the footswitch, I'll have three switches: Drive+PAB, PAB alone
and MidBoost. Only way to access Drive without PAB would be through the
front panel.
Thank you all.
All the best.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
That OT secondary ground should be grounded at the PI ground point not on the chassis so close to the input ground.
Also you may have noise problems with the OT mounted above the preamp like that. I have an amp with the OT mounted there and was picking up noise until I made a metal shield to cover the area around the preamp where the OT was.
TT
Also you may have noise problems with the OT mounted above the preamp like that. I have an amp with the OT mounted there and was picking up noise until I made a metal shield to cover the area around the preamp where the OT was.
TT
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
Thanks, TT. That's the kind of advice I need. I can run the OT ground overtictac wrote:That OT secondary ground should be grounded at the PI ground point not on the chassis so close to the input ground.
Also you may have noise problems with the OT mounted above the preamp like that. I have an amp with the OT mounted there and was picking up noise until I made a metal shield to cover the area around the preamp where the OT was.
TT
to the PT ground. Is that okay?
This amp is a rebuild and I'm trying not to have another chassis made. This
is the way the trannies are mounted. Before hand, the amp was quiet. Not
dead quiet, but quiet. Since I'm cutting short all leads, I'm hoping to minimize
noise evne further. What do you think?
All the best. (I'll fix the file tonight)
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
Ground the OT where the 390 ohm PI tail resistor is grounded.
Neat lead dress is always a good idea. shorten and shield those grid wires where ever posible.
TT
Neat lead dress is always a good idea. shorten and shield those grid wires where ever posible.
TT
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
As I wait for the new PT (and the rest of the parts missing), here's some
changes. I cluttered the layout even more. The point being to exclude
the back panel and cut the chassis (of course, rebuild a wooden back
board) - doing so would make working on the amp sooooo much easier.
What do you think? Here's a pic of the amp as is and the new layout.
I also added a 'simulated' heater from lamp to V1 only but you get the idea
Any critics is deeply appreciated.
changes. I cluttered the layout even more. The point being to exclude
the back panel and cut the chassis (of course, rebuild a wooden back
board) - doing so would make working on the amp sooooo much easier.
What do you think? Here's a pic of the amp as is and the new layout.
I also added a 'simulated' heater from lamp to V1 only but you get the idea
Any critics is deeply appreciated.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: HRM odd Layout - advice needed
Oh. I also plan on making a bigger back panel covering the tubes but
with an added oval cut and see how it sounds.
with an added oval cut and see how it sounds.