Layout norm? wouldn't mind trying it on mine...
I'll see if I can whip one up in the next few days.
That made a huge difference on my Peavey transplant too. I'd do it to my Princeton transplant but there's no room.
Yep, remarkable difference, eh?

I spent the whole day playing yesterday. Man, my fingers are sore. haha
How much different (wiring and part wise) is the HRM to non-HRM ? As I built mine from Your Bassman-layout (and I love it) it would be nice to know if it would be possible to put a nonHRM-HRM switch in it.
Gary was able to add this switching to his amps, but I think it's easier to have two amps. To convert the Bassman I had to change the mid, drive, and level pots, OD input network, mid cap, cathode bypass, and of course, add the post-OD tone stack in place of OD2 coupling cap. That would be a pretty tall order for a relay bozo like me.
If you lay it out as he did, use the correct parts and tweaks as Dogears suggests and don't try to re-invent grounding schemes or relay circuits, you will end up with argubly one of the best sounding amps ever produced that is completely noise free and capable of playing any style from Country to Blues to Metal and everything in between.
Every little detail matters and just a few component diversions or substitutions can throw it right off.
I couldn't agree more. I don't think the cleans are as sweet (since there's less mid scoop) but the HRM is far more responsive. With the PAB "off" and OD at 10:00, you can go from clean to crunch just by varying pick attack. (Strat neck pickup.) What surprised me is how effortless it is to control dynamics. I can do the same thing with my Trainwreck, but I have to work at it. With PAB "on" it will definately do metal...or fusion.
