Ceriatone 50 watt HRM

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
tjauernig
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 3:56 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Ceriatone 50 watt HRM

Post by tjauernig »

Anybody out there used any pt's and ot's other than Mercury in these?
T. Jauernig
IcemanB52
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:10 pm
Location: Sarasota, FL

Hammond Xfmers

Post by IcemanB52 »

I typically use the 290DX and 1750M from http://www.radiodaze.com/ in my builds. I haven't seen any conclusive information that the Mercury's sound better. If you do a search, I'm sure you'll find several threads on this topic. Cheers, Richard
JD0x0
Posts: 556
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:19 am

Re: Ceriatone 50 watt HRM

Post by JD0x0 »

also just remember theres no such thing as "this or that transformer sounds BETTER" with guitar tone theres only different, member A might love transformer X while member B might hate transformer X and love transformer Y.

The only thing you can really do is buy some quality trannys and hopefully they sound better to you, and then the stock trannys are good for backups.

Personally i really dont think that the mercury magnetics are worth the money for these amps simply because there are so many good choices out there for dumbles. But a hiwatt, for example, works best with their partridge design, MM might work better for that application just because of the fact they clone the old partridge trannys and it'll probably be cheaper than a NOS(if you can find one)
It's true i've lost my marbles and i cant remember where i put them
rvf263
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:38 pm
Location: Southeast Michigan

Re: Hammond Xfmers

Post by rvf263 »

IcemanB52 wrote:I typically use the 290DX and 1750M from http://www.radiodaze.com/ in my builds. I haven't seen any conclusive information that the Mercury's sound better. If you do a search, I'm sure you'll find several threads on this topic. Cheers, Richard
Have you ever used the 291DX?
It's suppose to be an upgrade but costs about $40 more.
I wonder if it's worth the upcharge.
RvF
IcemanB52
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:10 pm
Location: Sarasota, FL

291DX

Post by IcemanB52 »

I looked at the data sheets from hammond, but the difference between the normal unit and the upgraded one wasn't obvious (atleast to me).
rvf263
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:38 pm
Location: Southeast Michigan

Re: 291DX

Post by rvf263 »

IcemanB52 wrote:I looked at the data sheets from hammond, but the difference between the normal unit and the upgraded one wasn't obvious (atleast to me).
That's good to know, I just went with the 290DX.
RvF
LPSGME
Posts: 140
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:20 am

Re: Ceriatone 50 watt HRM

Post by LPSGME »

Anyone have an opinion on how the stock HRM/OTS Ceriatone OT xformer sounds in comparison to others?
JImmyD
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:23 pm

Re: Ceriatone 50 watt HRM

Post by JImmyD »

LPSGME wrote:Anyone have an opinion on how the stock HRM/OTS Ceriatone OT xformer sounds in comparison to others?
The build quality MAY be spotty on the OT's. Mine sounds OK to my ears especially at volume, and my buddy complains that his is down on power. He has good ears so his opinion counts. I do think my amp sounds a little dull to me at times. I know it can be tweaked a bit (or alot).

Is there better iron out there then what Ceriatone uses?

Without question. Do I know what it is? Not yet, but a careful reading of this forum provides many opinions! :-)

In the end, all it takes is money and time.

Jim - coming up on two years of OTS ownership
Guitarman18
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 9:32 pm
Location: UK

Re: Ceriatone 50 watt HRM

Post by Guitarman18 »

JImmyD wrote:
The build quality MAY be spotty on the OT's.
True, there have been a number of posts where people have reported what seems like an unusually high number of failures.

Cheers, Paul.
Post Reply