New Rocket build
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
-
andresound
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:48 am
- Location: Durban South Africa
Re: New Rocket build
Voltages were a bit high with the custom wound mains transformer, So decided to throw in a 5U4G NOS tube just for kicks. Couldn't stop playing her. WOW!! Sounds fricken awesome. Haven't checked how much the voltage dropped by yet, and still have to check out bias resistor and measure dissipation.
But beautiful sound. Harmonic feedback even when playing clean!! Could not be happier. Will be interesting to see what the voltages have done.
But beautiful sound. Harmonic feedback even when playing clean!! Could not be happier. Will be interesting to see what the voltages have done.
If it sounds good, it is good! Trust your ears
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: New Rocket build
Indeed it will be interesting to see where the voltages are now that you have it singing. The 5U4 probably drops an additional 20V re GZ34, and it will add some sag. Something around 290V is the target for the plate voltage. Don't forget 5U4 needs an additional amp of filament current.
Accurate plate dissipation calculation means you need plate current alone, which you can get using the OT primary resistance, or you can use the cathode and screen resistor values to find Ia from Ik - Is.
Accurate plate dissipation calculation means you need plate current alone, which you can get using the OT primary resistance, or you can use the cathode and screen resistor values to find Ia from Ik - Is.
-
andresound
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:48 am
- Location: Durban South Africa
Re: New Rocket build
Hi Martin,
I will check and post voltages. Here is a pic. Btw, The "motor boating" is still a mystery! Put the valves back in, and the problem came back. Took the offending set of NOS MULLARDS to a friend with an AVO tester, and they all tested good and 100% +!!. Strange
The PT has a 5v rating of 4A
I will check and post voltages. Here is a pic. Btw, The "motor boating" is still a mystery! Put the valves back in, and the problem came back. Took the offending set of NOS MULLARDS to a friend with an AVO tester, and they all tested good and 100% +!!. Strange
The PT has a 5v rating of 4A
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
If it sounds good, it is good! Trust your ears
-
andresound
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:48 am
- Location: Durban South Africa
Re: New Rocket build
Cabinet waiting to be made
Red Rivergum. Extremely hard wood.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
If it sounds good, it is good! Trust your ears
-
andresound
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:48 am
- Location: Durban South Africa
Re: New Rocket build
Voltages briefly with the 5U4 installed (on 280-0-280 tap) are,martin manning wrote:Indeed it will be interesting to see where the voltages are now that you have it singing. The 5U4 probably drops an additional 20V re GZ34, and it will add some sag. Something around 290V is the target for the plate voltage. Don't forget 5U4 needs an additional amp of filament current.
Accurate plate dissipation calculation means you need plate current alone, which you can get using the OT primary resistance, or you can use the cathode and screen resistor values to find Ia from Ik - Is.
Cathode to plate of 286.4v
Voltage drop over cathode resistor (66 ohm) of 11.02
Plate (pin7) of 294
According to the tube bias calculator,
39.5ma per tube
11.3 watts per tube
= 94.2 % dissipation
I tried the MULLARD GZ34 again (on 250-0-250 tap)
41.9ma
12.5 watts
104.2 %
Plate (pin7) of 311.2
Although the higher dissipation (GZ34) sounds "bigger/bolder" and louder, I prefer the sound of the 5U4 installed. Seem to bloom and is rich in harmonics!!
If it sounds good, it is good! Trust your ears
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: New Rocket build
Looks great, and thanks for the report on the 5U4 vs. GZ34. What bias calculator are you using? For the 5U4, cathode current = 11.02/66/4 = 41.7 mA/tube, so I would estimate (294-11)*41.7 = 11.8W including screen current, maybe 90% of that without.
-
andresound
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:48 am
- Location: Durban South Africa
Re: New Rocket build
I used the Weber and the rorobinette.com bias calculators. They both gave the same result. However, I trust your calculations better
. Also that means my bias would be sweet @ 11.8w.
FWIW, All rectifier tubes are NOS. I also have 2 Phillips GZ34 (made in Holland) and 2 other old 5U4's which I can't remember the brand, (all tested 100%+). I will do some tube rolling and see if the "rich harmonic" sound is tube dependent or voltage dependent.
FWIW, All rectifier tubes are NOS. I also have 2 Phillips GZ34 (made in Holland) and 2 other old 5U4's which I can't remember the brand, (all tested 100%+). I will do some tube rolling and see if the "rich harmonic" sound is tube dependent or voltage dependent.
If it sounds good, it is good! Trust your ears
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: New Rocket build
Thanks for the vote of confidence! As a rule I do not use on-line calculators as you often don't know what assumptions are being made. With 11.8W calculated using cathode current, you can assume actual plate dissipation (plate current x Va-k) is about 10% less.* Looks like the 66R resistor will be fine with either rectifier tube. I'm interested to hear what you find out re different brands of rectifier. Hi-Fi guys think it matters, but...
* For pentodes; beam types 5% less.
* For pentodes; beam types 5% less.
-
andresound
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:48 am
- Location: Durban South Africa
Re: New Rocket build
Hi Martin,
Will report this week on different tube brands. Will try the amp in a band situation tonight. BTW, I am a Hi-Fi guy. But, I have been to counselling and I'm OK now
Will report this week on different tube brands. Will try the amp in a band situation tonight. BTW, I am a Hi-Fi guy. But, I have been to counselling and I'm OK now
If it sounds good, it is good! Trust your ears
-
andresound
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:48 am
- Location: Durban South Africa
Re: New Rocket build
Will the 66R resistor + GZ34 on 280-0-280v tap also be OK? I don't get red plating, so maybe it is. Just don't want to destroy a set of tubes. BTW, if the output tubes fry, do I risk damaging the OT?martin manning wrote:Thanks for the vote of confidence! As a rule I do not use on-line calculators as you often don't know what assumptions are being made. With 11.8W calculated using cathode current, you can assume actual plate dissipation (plate current x Va-k) is about 10% less.* Looks like the 66R resistor will be fine with either rectifier tube. I'm interested to hear what you find out re different brands of rectifier. Hi-Fi guys think it matters, but...
* For pentodes; beam types 5% less.
If it sounds good, it is good! Trust your ears
Re: New Rocket build
Good stuff. After some Rk rolling I settled on 68r with Va at 302 with a solid state full wave bridge. Also tried drinking with the PI drive amplitude. Think it ended up back at stock values.
I like the fact that tube rectifier type can be used to change the B+ value, but I must admit that I prefer a ss fwb with plenty of current capability in the power transformer. That might be more due to a reliability feel good factor than a sag/sonic thing.
Output tubes are a consumable - especially with a Rocket. I've never had an OT problem with them though.
I like the fact that tube rectifier type can be used to change the B+ value, but I must admit that I prefer a ss fwb with plenty of current capability in the power transformer. That might be more due to a reliability feel good factor than a sag/sonic thing.
Output tubes are a consumable - especially with a Rocket. I've never had an OT problem with them though.
Why Aye Man
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: New Rocket build
If you don't see red-plating at idle, you are probably ok. You will shorten the life of the tubes if you run them hot, though. If you're interested, calculate the dissipation to see how hot. If it's much over 100%, then it would be better to avoid that combination or increase the cathode resistor value.andresound wrote:Will the 66R resistor + GZ34 on 280-0-280v tap also be OK? I don't get red plating, so maybe it is. Just don't want to destroy a set of tubes. BTW, if the output tubes fry, do I risk damaging the OT?
It is possible that a shorted output tube can destroy an output transformer and/or other components before the mains fuse blows. The best insurance against that is to replace the output tubes before they fail, say after a year or two of regular use.
-
andresound
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:48 am
- Location: Durban South Africa
Re: New Rocket build
Thanks guys.
Martin, how much over 100% dissipation is too much?
Martin, how much over 100% dissipation is too much?
If it sounds good, it is good! Trust your ears
- martin manning
- Posts: 14308
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: New Rocket build
Measuring with cathode current I wouldn't run above 110%. That means actual anode dissipation would be ~100%. Calculate as follows:
Vk (Va - Vk)
-------------- should be <= 1.1
4 Rk Pa max
Vk (Va - Vk)
-------------- should be <= 1.1
4 Rk Pa max
-
andresound
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:48 am
- Location: Durban South Africa
Re: New Rocket build
Been a bit quiet here, so decided to post. Finally... Almost.... Nearly... Finished cab.!!!! Just need to engrave faceplate. Might also consider a bright switch..... Tried a 4.7uf cathode bypass cap on second stage (didn't have a 22uf on hand)... Really like the sound.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
If it sounds good, it is good! Trust your ears