Master Vol. vs. Attenuator

Express, Liverpool, Rocket, Dirty Little Monster, etc.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
moj067
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 4:51 pm

Master Vol. vs. Attenuator

Post by moj067 »

I know alot of guys here feel that messing with the intent of the amp is wrong. However, with the popularity of the DIY Brake I was wondering if master vols. are not a way to go in whatever amp project I might pursue in the future. Ken has a master vol mod. in his 'Wreck pages after all.
I can't imagine everbody can crank this thing all the time w/out becoming unpopular among neighbors and spouses.
Jack
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:55 pm

Re: Master Vol. vs. Attenuator

Post by Jack »

IMO each amp has it's "favorite" MV and/or attenuation scheme. An attenuator is the most "portable" generally speaking. So one attenuator fits most if not all amps while a MV must be designed to fir within the "tone recipe" of a given amp. The trainwrecks are quite stage to stage interactive so power scaling or post OT attenuation seems like the way to go.
Matt72
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:41 am

Re: Master Vol. vs. Attenuator

Post by Matt72 »

FWIW, I just can't stand attenuators OR MVs. And I've tried lots. I just use smaller amps when I can't crank up the big guy. I haven't tried power scaling though. But MVs and atten....they just hurt the amp's tone.
Post Reply