Q: Why do you suppose Ken went with a GZ34 for the rectifier? There is no appreciable sag in a SE circuit and a GZ34 has the lowest anode resistance (about 50R) so will give very low voltage loss. Was it:From wreckboy's original description of the DLM...he wrote:2 ECC83 (GT Yugo)
1 EL 34 (Mullard xf2 )
1 GZ34 (Mullard)
a) For the tone?
b) No diode rectifier hash noise in a SE circuit?
c) Ken's love of Mullard GZ34s?
d) All of the above?
Second, the knob compliment in the DLM included a Slope setting. This implies that the mid "slope" resistor in the tone stack was made variable, probably via a fixed resistor in series with a pot (maybe 10k->100kB). The amp is said to be wonderfully clear and mid rich. In a JCM800, a 47k slope resistor yields a thick, mid rich tone.
Q: Do you think there was a fixed value for where the mid pot would sit in a tone stack, assuming this was a TW Express or Marshall tonestack (ref: the amp is specifically quoted as being much more a JCM800 than an Express).
Opinions, ideas, and speculation welcome.